Suppr超能文献

在甲状腺细针抽吸物的大多数 Bethesda 类别中,Hurthle 细胞的存在并不会增加恶性肿瘤的风险。

The Presence of Hürthle Cells Does Not Increase the Risk of Malignancy in Most Bethesda Categories in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates.

机构信息

Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Endocrine Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2020 Mar;30(3):425-431. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0190.

Abstract

Hürthle cell/oncocytic change is commonly reported on thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and may be considered an "atypical cell" by clinicians. This study aims to delineate the association between Hürthle cells in preoperative cytology and subsequent pathology of the indexed thyroid nodule and to report rates of malignancy. Retrospective review of records of 300 patients with Hürthle cell/oncocytic change on FNA and final surgical pathology at a tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2013 was performed and compared with a multi-institutional FNA cohort. The degree of Hürthle cell presence was correlated with histopathologic diagnoses. In the Hürthle cell FNA group, Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) categories were as follows: I (nondiagnostic) 14 (4.7%); II (benign) 113 (37.7%); III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) 33 (11%); IV (follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm) 125 (41.6%); V (suspicious for malignancy) 12 (4%); and VI (malignant) 3 (1%). When categorized based on the degree of Hürthle cell change, 59 (29%) were classified as mild, 13 (6%) moderate, and 131 (65%) as predominant. When comparing the results with a multi-institutional FNA cohort (all with surgical confirmation), the presence of Hürthle cells was found to be associated with a lower risk of malignancy in all BSRTC categories, with a statistically significant difference in the BSRTC IV and V groups. The sole exception was when Hürthle cell presence was classified as predominant (defined as >75% of the cellular population); the rate of malignancy was significantly elevated in FNAs interpreted as benign/Bethesda II. Although Hürthle cells have been considered by clinicians as an "atypical cell," their presence does not increase the risk of malignancy within BSRTC categories overall. However, when predominant Hürthle cell change is present, the risk of malignancy is increased in the benign cytology/BSRTC category II.

摘要

甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学检查(FNA)中常报告 Hurthle 细胞/嗜酸细胞改变,临床医生可能将其视为“非典型细胞”。本研究旨在阐明术前细胞学中 Hurthle 细胞与索引性甲状腺结节的后续病理之间的关系,并报告恶性肿瘤的发生率。对 2000 年至 2013 年在三级转诊中心接受 Hurthle 细胞/嗜酸细胞改变 FNA 和最终外科病理检查的 300 例患者的记录进行回顾性分析,并与多机构 FNA 队列进行比较。Hurthle 细胞的存在程度与组织病理学诊断相关。在 Hurthle 细胞 FNA 组中,Bethesda 甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统(BSRTC)类别如下:I(非诊断性)14 例(4.7%);II(良性)113 例(37.7%);III(意义不明确的非典型性/滤泡性病变意义不明确)33 例(11%);IV(滤泡性肿瘤/滤泡性肿瘤可疑)125 例(41.6%);V(疑似恶性肿瘤)12 例(4%);VI(恶性)3 例(1%)。当根据 Hurthle 细胞变化程度进行分类时,59 例(29%)为轻度,13 例(6%)为中度,131 例(65%)为主要。与多机构 FNA 队列(均经手术证实)的结果进行比较时,发现所有 BSRTC 类别中存在 Hurthle 细胞与恶性肿瘤风险降低相关,BSRTC IV 和 V 组的差异具有统计学意义。唯一的例外是当 Hurthle 细胞存在被归类为主要(定义为>75%的细胞群体)时;在良性/Bethesda II 解读的 FNAs 中,恶性肿瘤的发生率显著升高。虽然 Hurthle 细胞被临床医生视为“非典型细胞”,但它们在 BSRTC 类别中的存在并不会增加总体恶性肿瘤风险。然而,当主要 Hurthle 细胞改变存在时,良性细胞学/BSRTC 类别 II 中的恶性肿瘤风险增加。

相似文献

10
The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a single-center experience over 5 years.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(11):3522-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3743-1. Epub 2014 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound Pattern of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules with Prevalence of Oncocytes.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 23;14(15):5206. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155206.
2
Oncocytes in Thyroid Aspirates-Implications of Clinical Parameters and Cytologic Diagnosis.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251333358. doi: 10.1177/19160216251333358. Epub 2025 May 15.
4
Diagnostic Performance Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparation Methods in Thyroid FNAs.
J Cytol. 2023 Oct-Dec;40(4):184-191. doi: 10.4103/joc.joc_133_22. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
6
Hürthle Cell Carcinoma of the Thyroid Gland: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Adv Ther. 2021 Oct;38(10):5144-5164. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01876-7. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
7
The dilemma of F-FDG PET/CT thyroid incidentaloma: what we should expect from FNA. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Endocrine. 2021 Sep;73(3):540-549. doi: 10.1007/s12020-021-02683-4. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
Thyroid Hürthle Cell Carcinoma: Clinical, Pathological, and Molecular Features.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 23;13(1):26. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010026.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Hashimoto Thyroiditis on Thyroid Nodule Cytology and Risk of Thyroid Cancer.
J Endocr Soc. 2019 Mar 5;3(4):791-800. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00427. eCollection 2019 Apr 1.
2
Influence of Hashimoto Thyroiditis on the Development of Thyroid Nodules and Cancer in Children and Adolescents.
J Endocr Soc. 2019 Jan 4;3(3):607-616. doi: 10.1210/js.2018-00287. eCollection 2019 Mar 1.
4
Hürthle cells in fine-needle aspirates of the thyroid: a review of their diagnostic criteria and significance.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Apr;122(4):241-9. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21391. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
6
Clinical Review: Hashimoto's thyroiditis and papillary thyroid carcinoma: is there a correlation?
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):474-82. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2978. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
7
The significance of hurthle cells in thyroid disease.
Oncologist. 2011;16(10):1380-7. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0253. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
8
Predictors of malignancy in patients with a thyroid nodule that contains Hürthle cells.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Apr;144(4):514-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599810394052. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
10
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.
Thyroid. 2009 Nov;19(11):1159-65. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0274.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验