Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, 301 E 17th St, New York, NY 10003, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. Saint Clair, Suite 1350, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Injury. 2020 Mar;51(3):602-610. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.036. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
Scapular neck and body fractures are typically treated nonoperatively, with operative treatment traditionally focused on intraarticular fractures or double disruptions of the shoulder suspensory complex. The objective of this study was to systematically examine and compile the existing literature in regard to operative and conservative treatment of extraarticular fractures of the scapula.
A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement to find outcome data on fractures of the scapular neck and body. All studies from 1988 to 2018 that met inclusion criteria were reviewed independently and graded based on the modified Coleman Methodology Score. Outcomes of interest were compiled and analyzed for adjusted means.
42 manuscripts with a total of 669 patients were included for analysis from an initial search of 335 results. There was an average age of 41.2 years, 78.1% were male, 98.8% had a blunt force mechanism, and 66.7% had other injures outside the scapula at time of presentation. In total, there were 120 patients with scapular body fractures, 95 with scapular neck fractures, 130 with floating shoulder injuries including a scapular neck or body fracture, and 324 with an unspecified extraarticular scapular fracture. 464 patients were treated operatively, with a mean union rate of 99.4%, Constant score of 84.4, and end forward elevation of 158°. 205 total patients were treated non-operatively, with a mean union rate of 85.1%, Constant score of 79.0, and end forward elevation of 153°.
Patients with extraarticular fractures of the scapula have excellent outcomes following either nonoperative or operative management. There is a need for high quality comparative studies to determine the optimal treatment strategy for these injuries.
肩胛骨颈和体部骨折通常采用非手术治疗,手术治疗传统上侧重于关节内骨折或肩悬带复合体的双重中断。本研究的目的是系统地检查和编纂关于肩胛骨关节外骨折的手术和保守治疗的现有文献。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,对多个电子数据库进行了全面搜索,以查找肩胛骨颈和体部骨折的结果数据。对符合纳入标准的所有研究进行独立审查,并根据改良 Coleman 方法评分进行分级。编译并分析感兴趣的结果以获得调整后的平均值。
从最初的 335 项搜索中,共纳入了 42 篇论文,共 669 例患者进行分析。平均年龄为 41.2 岁,78.1%为男性,98.8%为钝性暴力机制,66.7%在就诊时存在肩胛骨以外的其他损伤。共有 120 例肩胛骨体部骨折,95 例肩胛骨颈部骨折,130 例浮肩损伤包括肩胛骨颈部或体部骨折,324 例肩胛骨关节外骨折未明确。464 例患者接受手术治疗,平均愈合率为 99.4%,Constant 评分为 84.4,最终前向抬高 158°。205 例患者接受非手术治疗,平均愈合率为 85.1%,Constant 评分为 79.0,最终前向抬高 153°。
肩胛骨关节外骨折患者无论采用非手术治疗还是手术治疗,均有良好的效果。需要高质量的比较研究来确定这些损伤的最佳治疗策略。