• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟咬合记录的临床准确性和可重复性。

Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records.

机构信息

Private practice, Seattle, Wash.

Clinical Assistant Professor, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Dec;124(6):667-673. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.014. Epub 2020 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.014
PMID:32014284
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Although in vitro studies have investigated the accuracy of virtual interocclusal records, clinical research on their ability to register virtual dental casts accurately is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the virtual interocclusal records of an intraoral scanning system compared with conventional polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) interocclusal records.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three conventional interocclusal records followed by 3 virtual interocclusal records per side per participant were made in 10 participants. Three sites of close proximity (SCP) and 3 sites of clearance (SC) per side per participant were identified on the transilluminated conventional interocclusal PVS records for a total of 60 SCP and SC. The presence or absence of these sites on the virtual interocclusal records was analyzed by using an independent software program.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for correct identification in the virtual interocclusal record was 87%, and its specificity was 95%. The positive predictive value was 95%, and the negative predictive value was 88%. For reproducibility, 74% of the SCP were detected consistently for all 3 repeated scans, and 92% of the SCs were identified accurately.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of virtual interocclusal records in identifying interocclusal contacts is clinically acceptable. However, the method tends to miss interocclusal contacts rather than introducing false ones and can result in perforations between the opposing virtual casts. Repeated buccal occlusal scans made of the same side showed fair reproducibility, and this aspect would benefit from further investigation.

摘要

问题陈述

尽管体外研究已经调查了虚拟咬合记录的准确性,但缺乏关于其准确记录虚拟牙颌模型的能力的临床研究。

目的

本临床研究的目的是评估一种口内扫描仪的虚拟咬合记录的准确性和可重复性,与传统的聚硅氧烷(PVS)咬合记录相比。

材料和方法

每个参与者的每侧制作 3 个传统咬合记录和 3 个虚拟咬合记录。每个参与者的每侧确定 3 个近接部位(SCP)和 3 个间隙部位(SC),总共 60 个 SCP 和 SC。使用独立的软件程序分析虚拟咬合记录上这些部位的存在或缺失。

结果

虚拟咬合记录中正确识别的灵敏度为 87%,特异性为 95%。阳性预测值为 95%,阴性预测值为 88%。对于可重复性,74%的 SCP 在所有 3 次重复扫描中都被一致检测到,92%的 SC 被准确识别。

结论

虚拟咬合记录在识别咬合接触方面的准确性在临床是可以接受的。然而,该方法往往会错过咬合接触,而不是引入虚假的接触,并且可能导致对颌虚拟模型之间的穿孔。同一侧的重复颊侧咬合扫描显示出良好的可重复性,这方面需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records.虚拟咬合记录的临床准确性和可重复性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Dec;124(6):667-673. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.014. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
2
The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.口内扫描中虚拟咬合记录的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Dec;120(6):904-912. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.比较虚拟牙科患者与上架牙模的最大牙尖交错接触。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Dec;88(6):622-30. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129379.
4
Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.根据咬合面三维图像计算得出的接触点的准确性。
J Dent. 2007 Jun;35(6):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
5
Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.通过数字颌间记录法安装的立体光刻模型咬合接触的准确性和精确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug;116(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.029. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
6
Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.传统咬合记录与虚拟咬合记录的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jul;114(1):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
7
Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?可用的牙合间间隙是否会影响口内扫描仪获取的颌间关系的准确性?
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Aug;132(2):435-440. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
In vivo precision of digital static interocclusal registration for full arch and quadrant arch scans: a randomized controlled clinical trial.全牙弓和象限弓扫描的数字静态咬合记录的体内精度:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02612-5.
9
Evaluation Methods and Influencing Factors on Accuracy for Static Virtual Articulation Obtained by Intraoral Scanners: A Critical Review of the Literature.口内扫描仪获取静态虚拟咬合精度的评估方法及影响因素:文献综述
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Feb;37(2):378-399. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13312. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
10
[Clinical application of a prefabricated interocclusal recording cap for making interocclusal records of implant-supported fixed prostheses].[一种预制咬合记录帽在制作种植体支持固定修复体咬合记录中的临床应用]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 9;56(12):1205-1210. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210923-00424.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of digital jaw relation determination in different occlusal conditions - an in vitro study.不同咬合条件下数字化颌关系确定的准确性——一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 14;29(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06101-7.
2
Comparative Assessment of the Accuracy of Digital Versus Conventional Interocclusal Records in Dentulous Patients: A Systematic Review.无牙颌患者数字与传统牙合记录准确性的比较评估:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Oct 21;16(10):e72002. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72002. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Evaluation of efficacy of digital or virtual bite registration over conventional techniques- A systematic review.
数字化或虚拟咬合记录与传统技术相比的疗效评估——一项系统评价。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Nov-Dec;14(6):785-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
4
An innovative evaluation method for clinical comparative analysis of occlusal contact regions obtained via intraoral scanning and conventional impression procedures: a clinical trial.一种基于口腔内扫描和传统印模技术的咬合接触区域临床比较分析的创新性评估方法:一项临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 24;28(10):543. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05940-8.
5
Recording maximal intercuspation and border positions of the mandible with intraoral scanner using the acquisition software's multi-occlusion function.使用采集软件的多咬合功能,通过口腔内扫描仪记录下颌的最大牙尖交错位和边缘位置。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Aug;16(4):221-230. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.221. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
6
Insights into Occlusal Analysis: Articulating Paper versus Digital Devices.咬合分析的见解:咬合纸与数字设备
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 1;13(15):4506. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154506.
7
Trueness evaluation of three intraoral scanners for the recording of maximal intercuspal position.三种口内扫描仪记录最大牙尖交错位的准确性评估。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Apr 1;42(2):227-233. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023277.
8
Digital Protocol to Record Occlusal Analysis in Prosthodontics: A Pilot Study.口腔修复学中记录咬合分析的数字协议:一项初步研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):1370. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051370.
9
Auxiliary occlusal devices for IO scanning in a complete digital workflow of implant-supported crowns: a randomized controlled trial.辅助咬合装置在种植体支持的牙冠全数字化工作流程中的 IO 扫描:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03986-4.
10
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single Implant-Supported Zirconia Crowns Following a Digital and Conventional Workflow: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.数字化与传统工作流程下单颗种植体支持的氧化锆全冠的临床及影像学结果:一项随机对照临床试验的四年随访
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 12;13(2):432. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020432.