Morsy Noha, Hammad Ihab
Fixed Prosthodontics, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Aug;16(4):221-230. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.221. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
This study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of intraoral scanner (IOS) for recording maximal intercuspal position (MIP) and border positions of the mandible.
Maxillary and mandibular master casts were articulated in MIP, protrusive, and lateral interocclusal position sequentially on a semi-adjustable articulator. For each articulation relation, sites of occlusal contacts (SOCs) and sites of clearance (SCs) were identified on the master casts with articulating paper (reference sites). IOS was used to take full arch scans and nine virtual interocclusal records (VIRs) for virtual articulation of models. Virtual SOCs and SCs were detected with 3D processing software and compared to those identified with the articulating paper. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each articulation relation.
For MIP, IOS showed adequate sensitivity and NPV of 100%, and specificity and a PPV of 99%. For protrusive position, the IOS showed a sensitivity and a NPV of 100%, a high PPV of 86%, and a specificity of 83%. For lateral positions, the specificity and the PPV were high (93% and 79%, respectively), but the sensitivity and the NPV were below the clinically acceptable limits (28% and 56%, respectively).
IOS displayed clinically acceptable accuracy for recording MIP and protrusive border mandibular position. However, IOS had less accuracy for lateral border mandibular position.
本研究旨在调查口腔内扫描仪(IOS)记录最大牙尖交错位(MIP)和下颌边界位置的准确性。
将上颌和下颌主模型在半可调式牙合架上依次在MIP、前伸和侧方牙合位进行咬合。对于每种咬合关系,使用咬合纸在主模型上确定咬合接触点(SOCs)和间隙点(SCs)(参考点)。使用IOS进行全牙弓扫描,并获取九个虚拟牙合记录(VIRs)用于模型的虚拟咬合。使用3D处理软件检测虚拟SOCs和SCs,并与用咬合纸确定的进行比较。计算每种咬合关系的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。
对于MIP,IOS显示出足够的敏感性和100%的NPV,以及99%的特异性和PPV。对于前伸位,IOS显示出100%的敏感性和NPV、86%的高PPV以及83%的特异性。对于侧方位,特异性和PPV较高(分别为93%和79%),但敏感性和NPV低于临床可接受限度(分别为28%和56%)。
IOS在记录MIP和下颌前伸边界位置方面显示出临床可接受的准确性。然而,IOS在下颌侧方边界位置的准确性较低。