• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国,受者血型与心脏移植结局的关系。

Association between recipient blood type and heart transplantation outcomes in the United States.

机构信息

Divisions of Cardiac Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.

Divisions of Cardiac Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr;39(4):363-370. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.006. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.006
PMID:32014332
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In heart transplantation (HT), although blood type O organs can go to any blood type, non-O organs may not be allocated to adult O recipients. Therefore, O candidates wait longer than non-O candidates and frequently require bridging with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The effects of this discrepancy are rarely investigated in a large registry. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between candidates' blood type and their outcomes after HT listing.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry, including 34,352 candidates listed for a single-organ, primary HT from January 2000 through December 2015. Main outcome measures were waitlist mortality and post-HT mortality, using blood type A as reference. We conducted inverse-probability weighting to adjust for baseline profiles.

RESULTS

Among 34,352 candidates (median age 55, interquartile range 46-62; female 24.8%; blood type A: 13,258, AB: 1,572, B: 4,599, O:14,923), 22,714 candidates (A: 71.5%, AB: 82.1%, B: 73.0%, O: 57.5%; p < 0.001) underwent HT during the study period. Among recipients, bridging LVAD rate was highest in O recipients (A: 23.0%, AB: 15.3%, B: 23.4%, O: 32.1%; p < 0.001). After inverse-probability weighting, O patients demonstrated a significantly higher hazard of death after listing (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.16) and after HT (adjusted hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13) as compared with A.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a survival discrepancy among blood types. Our findings should facilitate more prospective studies to revisit current policies regarding equity in allocation, where possible.

摘要

背景

在心脏移植(HT)中,尽管血型 O 的器官可以分配给任何血型,但非 O 型器官可能不会分配给成人 O 型受者。因此,O 型候选者等待的时间比非 O 型候选者长,并且经常需要使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)进行桥接。这种差异的影响在大型登记处很少被调查。本研究的目的是评估候选者的血型与其 HT 列表后的结果之间的关联。

方法

这是一项使用美国器官共享网络登记处的回顾性队列研究,包括 2000 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受单一器官、原发性 HT 的 34352 名候选者。主要观察指标是等待名单死亡率和 HT 后死亡率,以血型 A 为参照。我们进行了逆概率加权以调整基线特征。

结果

在 34352 名候选者中(中位年龄 55 岁,四分位距 46-62;女性 24.8%;血型 A:13258,AB:1572,B:4599,O:14923),22714 名候选者(A:71.5%,AB:82.1%,B:73.0%,O:57.5%;p < 0.001)在研究期间接受了 HT。在受者中,O 型受者的 LVAD 桥接率最高(A:23.0%,AB:15.3%,B:23.4%,O:32.1%;p < 0.001)。在逆概率加权后,O 型患者在列表后(调整后的危险比 1.11,95%置信区间[CI] 1.07-1.16)和 HT 后(调整后的危险比 1.07,95% CI 1.01-1.13)的死亡风险显著更高。

结论

血型之间存在生存差异。我们的发现应该有助于更多的前瞻性研究来重新审视当前关于分配公平性的政策,在可能的情况下。

相似文献

1
Association between recipient blood type and heart transplantation outcomes in the United States.在美国,受者血型与心脏移植结局的关系。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr;39(4):363-370. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.006. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Impact of Sharing O Heart With Non-O Recipients: Simulation in the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry.与非 O 型受者共享 O 型供心的影响:美国器官共享网络注册中心的模拟研究。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Nov;106(5):1356-1363. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.039. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
3
Survival on the Heart Transplant Waiting List.心脏移植等待名单上的存活率。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1227-1235. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2795.
4
Outcomes of Multiple Listing for Adult Heart Transplantation in the United States: Analysis of OPTN Data From 2000 to 2013.美国成人心脏移植多重登记的结果:对2000年至2013年器官共享联合网络数据的分析
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Dec;3(12):933-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
5
Strategies of Wait-listing for Heart Transplant vs Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Alone for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.晚期心力衰竭患者心脏移植与单纯耐用机械循环支持候补策略。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):652-659. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0631.
6
Sex Differences in Mortality Based on United Network for Organ Sharing Status While Awaiting Heart Transplantation.等待心脏移植期间基于器官共享联合网络状态的死亡率性别差异
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003635.
7
Waitlist and transplant outcomes in heart transplant candidates bridged with temporary endovascular right ventricular assist devices.临时血管内右心室辅助装置桥接的心脏移植候选者的候补名单和移植结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Mar;43(3):369-378. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
8
Ventricular Assist Device Utilization in Heart Transplant Candidates: Nationwide Variability and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes.心室辅助装置在心脏移植候选者中的应用:全国范围内的差异及其对等待名单结果的影响。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004586. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004586.
9
Trends in the Use of Inotropes to List Adult Heart Transplant Candidates at Status 1A.将成人心脏移植候选人列为1A状态时使用血管活性药物的趋势。
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Dec;10(12). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004483.
10
Presence of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Wait-List Mortality of Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Heart Transplantation.植入式心脏复律除颤器的存在与作为心脏移植桥梁的左心室辅助装置支持患者的等待名单死亡率
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;231:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.148. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Heart Transplantation Allocation and Outcomes by Blood Type in Korea (2010-2022).韩国血型对心脏移植分配及结果的差异(2010 - 2022年)
Korean Circ J. 2025 Jun;55(6):481-493. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0281. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Clinical Outcomes for Heart-Alone and Multiorgan Transplant Under the New Heart Allocation Policy Era.新心脏分配政策时代心脏单独移植和多器官移植的临床结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr;14(7):e036687. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036687. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
3
Donation after circulatory death improves probability of heart transplantation in waitlisted candidates and results in post-transplant outcomes similar to those achieved with brain-dead donors.
心跳停止后捐献可提高等候心脏移植患者的移植概率,并产生与脑死亡供体移植后结果相似的效果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;167(5):1845-1860.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.09.012. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients undergoing heart transplantation.心脏移植患者的临床特征和结局的性别差异。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;10(4):2596-2606. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14413. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
Prolonged waitlisting is associated with mortality in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-supported heart transplantation candidates.在接受体外膜肺氧合支持的心脏移植候选患者中,长时间等待名单与死亡率相关。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Oct 5;12:234-254. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.09.010. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Concomitant or late aortic valve intervention and its efficacy for aortic insufficiency associated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.同期或晚期主动脉瓣干预及其对与持续血流左心室辅助装置植入相关的主动脉瓣关闭不全的疗效。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 15;9:1029984. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1029984. eCollection 2022.