• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解增强康复治疗下的非裔美国人和白种人的手术体验。

Understanding the Surgical Experience for African-Americans and Caucasians With Enhanced Recovery.

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Division of Preventative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Jun;250:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.034. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.034
PMID:32014697
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Racial/ethnic disparities in surgical outcomes exist. Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have reduced some racial/ethnic disparities, but it remains unclear if disparities in experiences are also reduced. The purpose of this study was to use qualitative methods to better understand the surgical experience for African-American and Caucasian patients in the setting of an ERP.

METHODS

Using purposeful sampling at a minority-serving institution, we recruited African-American and Caucasian patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under an ERP to six focus groups. Participants identified barriers and facilitators to a positive, or negative, surgical experience. Audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed using an indicative thematic approach with NVivo 10 software (QSR International).

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (15 African-Americans and 28 Caucasians) participated in six focus groups. Six themes were identified by patients to be important in surgery: 1) knowledge about colorectal surgery, 2) obtaining information, 3) quality of information, 4) setting expectations about surgery, 5) following preoperative and postoperative instructions, and 6) confidence in surgery outcomes. For both racial/ethnic groups, patients felt that more information could have been provided, information should be given at their level of understanding, and trust in the physician made them feel confident in a positive outcome. African-American patients described experiences of having incorrect or no expectations on surgical outcomes, being provided inconsistent information, and feeling misled. African-Americans also described following instructions from family members and valued the importance of diet and exercise in recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

African-American and Caucasian surgical patients have varied surgical experiences even under an ERP. All patients, however, valued the ability to obtain, process, and understand health information during the surgical process. These elements define "health literacy" and suggest the importance of providing health literacy-sensitive care in surgery.

摘要

简介

手术结果存在种族/民族差异。 强化康复计划(ERPs)已经减少了一些种族/民族差异,但尚不清楚体验方面的差异是否也有所减少。本研究的目的是使用定性方法更好地了解 ERP 环境中非洲裔美国人和白种人患者的手术经历。

方法

在少数民族服务机构中,通过目的性抽样,我们招募了在 ERP 下接受结直肠手术的非裔美国人和白种人患者,参加了六个焦点小组。参与者确定了对积极或消极手术体验的障碍和促进因素。使用 NVivo 10 软件(QSR International)以指示性主题方法对音频记录进行转录和分析。

结果

43 名患者(15 名非裔美国人和 28 名白种人)参加了六个焦点小组。患者确定了 6 个对手术重要的主题:1)结直肠手术知识,2)获取信息,3)信息质量,4)对手术的期望,5)遵循术前和术后的指示,以及 6)对手术结果的信心。对于两个种族/民族群体,患者都感到可以提供更多的信息,信息应该根据他们的理解水平提供,并且对医生的信任使他们对积极的结果有信心。非裔美国患者描述了对手术结果的期望不正确或没有期望,提供了不一致的信息,并感到被误导。非裔美国人还描述了遵循家庭成员的指示,并重视饮食和运动在康复中的重要性。

结论

即使在 ERP 下,非裔美国人和白种人手术患者的手术经历也有所不同。但是,所有患者都重视在手术过程中获得,处理和理解健康信息的能力。这些元素定义了“健康素养”,并表明在手术中提供健康素养敏感护理的重要性。

相似文献

1
Understanding the Surgical Experience for African-Americans and Caucasians With Enhanced Recovery.了解增强康复治疗下的非裔美国人和白种人的手术体验。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jun;250:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.034. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
Reduced disparities and improved surgical outcomes for Asian Americans with colorectal cancer.减少美国亚裔结直肠癌患者的差异并改善手术效果。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.036. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Barriers and Facilitators of Stroke Recovery: Perspectives From African Americans With Stroke, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals.中风康复的障碍与促进因素:非裔美国中风患者、护理人员及医疗保健专业人员的观点
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Sep;28(9):2506-2516. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Racial Differences in Satisfaction with VA Health Care: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.患者对 VA 医疗保健满意度的种族差异:一项混合方法试点研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2015 Sep;2(3):317-29. doi: 10.1007/s40615-014-0075-6. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Racial Disparity in Length of Stay Following Implementation of a Bariatric Enhanced Recovery Program.实施减重增强康复方案后住院时间的种族差异。
J Surg Res. 2024 Jun;298:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
7
"I Want to Keep the Personal Relationship With My Doctor": Understanding Barriers to Portal Use among African Americans and Latinos.“我希望与我的医生保持私人关系”:理解非裔美国人和拉丁裔人群使用医疗门户的障碍
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 3;18(10):e263. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5910.
8
Understanding the surgical experience for Black and White patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): The importance of health literacy.了解黑人和白人炎症性肠病 (IBD) 患者的手术经历:健康素养的重要性。
Am J Surg. 2022 Feb;223(2):303-311. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
Influence of racial disparities on patient-reported satisfaction and short- and long-term perception of health status after elective lumbar spine surgery.种族差异对患者报告的满意度以及择期腰椎手术后健康状况的短期和长期认知的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):40-45. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.SPINE171079. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
10
Disparities in Age-Associated Cognitive Decline Between African-American and Caucasian Populations: The Roles of Health Literacy and Education.非裔美国人和白种人群体在年龄相关认知衰退方面的差异:健康素养和教育的作用。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1716-23. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14257. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Low Health Literacy in Surgical Populations.解决外科人群健康素养低的问题。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 May 2;38(1):26-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786389. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Achieving Health Equity: Advancing Colorectal Surgery among Racial and Ethnic Minorities in America.实现健康公平:促进美国少数族裔中的结直肠手术发展。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024 May 13;38(1):34-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786532. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Development of a comprehensive survey to assess key socioecological determinants of health.
开发一项全面调查以评估健康的关键社会生态决定因素。
Surgery. 2024 Apr;175(4):991-999. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.011. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
A socioecological qualitative analysis of barriers to care in colorectal surgery.社会生态学定性分析结直肠手术中护理障碍。
Surgery. 2023 Jul;174(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
5
Issues in patients' experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) : a systematic review of qualitative evidence.术后加速康复(ERAS)患者体验中的问题:系统评价定性证据。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 21;13(2):e068910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068910.
6
Long-Term Complications of Open and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in an Afro-Caribbean Population.非洲加勒比人群中开放性和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期并发症
Cureus. 2022 May 26;14(5):e25370. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25370. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Recommendations for Researchers on Synchronous, Online, Nominal Group Sessions in Times of COVID-19: Fishbone Analysis.给研究人员的关于COVID-19时期同步在线名义小组会议的建议:鱼骨分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 25;6(3):e34539. doi: 10.2196/34539.
8
Understanding the surgical experience for Black and White patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): The importance of health literacy.了解黑人和白人炎症性肠病 (IBD) 患者的手术经历:健康素养的重要性。
Am J Surg. 2022 Feb;223(2):303-311. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic.在全球大流行期间实施虚拟焦点小组进行定性数据收集
Am J Surg. 2021 May;221(5):918-922. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 12.