Suppr超能文献

[共同性斜视中调节的客观参数]

[Objective parameters of accommodation in concomitant strabismus].

作者信息

Tarutta E P, Aklaeva N A, Tarasova N A, Larina T Yu, Kushnarevich N Yu

机构信息

Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062.

出版信息

Vestn Oftalmol. 2019;135(6):11-16. doi: 10.17116/oftalma201913506111.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop an objective method of determining binocular accommodative response (AR) and concomitant accommodation in patients with strabismus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 34 patients (68 eyes) with concomitant horizontal strabismus aged 6 to 32 years. The parameters of accommodation were measured using open field Binocular Auto Ref/Keratometer Grand Seiko WR-5100K (Grand Seiko Co. Ltd., Japan). The prism was placed in front of the deviated eye or the prisms were distributed evenly in front of both eyes until the deviation was eliminated.

RESULTS

The addition of prisms had no effect on the refractometry results. In convergent strabismus monocular, binocular, direct and consensual accommodation responses were significantly higher than in divergent: -2.15±0.1 D and -1.66±0.12 D; -2.13±0.09 D and -1.33±0.14 D; -2,04±0,15 D and -1,16±0,1 D; -1.97±0.15 D and -1.06±0.09 D, respectively. In divergent strabismus and myopia, the binocular response was 2.8 times higher than in hyperopia (-1.8±0.09 D and -0.63±0.04 D, respectively). Resting tonus of accommodation (RTA) value was higher in patients with hyperopia, both with convergent (mean -2.27±0.41 D) and divergent strabismus (-2.36±0.47 D). Minimal RTA was observed in patients with convergent strabismus and myopia (mean -0.75±0.1 D).

CONCLUSION

The study resulted in the development of a method of objective accommodometry of strabismic patients with deviation eliminated by prisms. Monocular and binocular AR were significantly higher in convergent strabismus compared to divergent, where consensual accommodation of the squinting eye is significantly reduced compared to the paired one. In patients with consensual strabismus, RTA is significantly higher in hyperopia than in myopia regardless of the form of strabismus.

摘要

目的

开发一种客观方法来确定斜视患者的双眼调节反应(AR)及伴随的调节。

材料与方法

该研究纳入了34例年龄在6至32岁的伴有水平斜视的患者(68只眼)。使用开放式视野双目自动验光仪/角膜曲率计Grand Seiko WR - 5100K(日本精工株式会社)测量调节参数。将棱镜置于偏斜眼前,或在双眼前方均匀分布棱镜,直至斜视消除。

结果

添加棱镜对验光结果无影响。在集合性斜视中,单眼、双眼、直接和双眼同视的调节反应显著高于散开性斜视:分别为-2.15±0.1D和-1.66±0.12D;-2.13±0.09D和-1.33±0.14D;-2.04±0.15D和-1.16±0.1D;-1.97±0.15D和-1.06±0.09D。在散开性斜视和近视患者中,双眼反应比远视患者高2.8倍(分别为-1.8±0.09D和-0.63±0.04D)。远视患者的调节静息张力(RTA)值较高,无论是集合性斜视(平均-2.27±0.41D)还是散开性斜视(-2.36±0.47D)。集合性斜视和近视患者的RTA最小(平均-0.75±0.1D)。

结论

该研究开发出一种通过棱镜消除偏斜来客观测量斜视患者调节的方法。与散开性斜视相比,集合性斜视的单眼和双眼AR显著更高,其中斜视眼的双眼同视调节与对侧眼相比明显降低。在双眼同视斜视患者中,无论斜视形式如何,远视患者的RTA均显著高于近视患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验