Suppr超能文献

拉脱维亚在异常侵入性胎盘保守治疗方面的经验:两例病例报告。

Latvian experience in conservative management of abnormally invasive placenta: two case reports.

作者信息

Bokučava Diana, Vītiņa Sandra, Jansone Maira, Tirāne Mara, Krastiņa Zane, Prostaka Kristine, Vedmedovska Natalija

机构信息

Maternity Care Centre, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.

Radiology Research Laboratory, Diagnostic Radiology Institute, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.

出版信息

Acta Med Litu. 2019;26(3):153-158. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v26i3.4144.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abnormally invasive placentation (AIP) is a clinical term that describes situation when placenta does not separate spontaneously after delivery and its manual removal causes excessive bleeding (1). Historically, the treatment of choice for this condition is hysterectomy. Lately, the new treatment option, conservative management of the AIP, has proven itself an effective alternative to hysterectomy in carefully selected patients (2). However, the use of conservative AIP management is limited in many countries, the reasoning being the lack of doctors' experience in this procedure and concerns regarding a high postpartum infection rate.

CASE REPORTS

We present the first two cases of conservative management of AIP in Latvia.Most of prenatally diagnosed AIP cases country-wide are referred to the Paul Stradinš University Hospital, which is a tertiary referral hospital. The annual rate of AIP in the hospital varies from five to ten cases.Two pregnant women were diagnosed with AIP prenatally, both of them refused hysterectomy and therefore went for the conservative management of AIP. During Caesarean section operation, placentas were left after delivery of the baby. During the follow-up period of 12 and 14 weeks, both women developed infection complications, but complete placental tissue resolution was diagnosed in the end.

CONCLUSION

These two cases demonstrate that conservative management of AIP can be safely applied in small countries/areas with small AIP rate and management experience.

摘要

背景

异常侵袭性胎盘植入(AIP)是一个临床术语,用于描述分娩后胎盘不能自发分离且人工剥离会导致大量出血的情况(1)。从历史上看,这种情况的首选治疗方法是子宫切除术。最近,新的治疗选择——AIP的保守治疗,已被证明在精心挑选的患者中是子宫切除术的有效替代方法(2)。然而,AIP保守治疗在许多国家的应用有限,原因是医生缺乏该手术的经验以及对产后感染率较高的担忧。

病例报告

我们介绍拉脱维亚首例AIP保守治疗的两个病例。全国产前诊断出的大多数AIP病例都被转诊至三级转诊医院保罗·斯特拉迪纳斯大学医院。该医院AIP的年发病率在5至10例之间。两名孕妇在产前被诊断为AIP,她们都拒绝接受子宫切除术,因此选择了AIP的保守治疗。剖宫产手术时,婴儿分娩后保留胎盘。在12周和14周的随访期内,两名女性均出现感染并发症,但最终均诊断为胎盘组织完全溶解。

结论

这两个病例表明,AIP的保守治疗可以在AIP发病率和治疗经验较少的小国/地区安全应用。

相似文献

4
Conservative management of abnormally invasive placentation.异常侵袭性胎盘植入的保守治疗
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007 Aug;62(8):529-39. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000271133.27011.05.

本文引用的文献

3
Underlying mechanisms of retained placenta: Evidence from a population based cohort study.胎盘滞留的潜在机制:基于人群队列研究的证据
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.06.035. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
4
Management of placenta accreta.胎盘植入的管理。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Oct;92(10):1125-34. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12222.
6
The morbidly adherent placenta: an overview of management options.病态粘连性胎盘:管理选择概述。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Sep;89(9):1126-33. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.503869.
7
Maternal outcome after conservative treatment of placenta accreta.胎盘植入保守治疗后的母体结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):526-534. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d066d4.
8
Conservative management of abnormally invasive placentation.异常侵袭性胎盘植入的保守治疗
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007 Aug;62(8):529-39. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000271133.27011.05.
9
Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis.胎盘植入异常:二十年分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.074.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验