Higher Component Malposition Rates with Patient-Specific Cruciate Retaining TKA than Contemporary Posterior Stabilized TKA.

Customized individually manufactured total knee arthroplasty (CIM-TKA) was developed to improve kinematic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performance. Component placement accuracy may influence the success of CIM-TKA designs. We performed this study to compare radiographic component alignment and revision rates of a cruciate retaining (CR) CIM-TKA and a contemporary posterior stabilized TKA (PS-TKA). After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval, we identified 94 CR CIM-TKAs (76 patients) and 91 PS-TKAs (82 patients) performed between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 41.1 months, range 24-59 months). We performed a retrospective electronic medical record review to identify patient demographic characteristics and revision procedures performed. Postoperative plain radiographs were reviewed to assess component alignment including cruciate ligament imbalance, femoral overhang, and femoral notching. Demographic characteristics, component malalignment, and revision surgery rates were assessed using a student's -test or two-tailed Fisher's exact test, with a -value < 0.05 designating significance. Technical errors were more commonly identified with CR CIM-TKA (29.8 vs. 9.9%,  < 0.001), including higher rates of tibiofemoral instability (13.8 vs. 1.1%,  < 0.01), femoral notching (12.8 vs. 3.3%,  = 0.03), and patellofemoral malalignment (20.2 vs. 7.7%,  = 0.02). CR CIM-TKA had more frequent coronal plane malposition (26.6 vs. 9.9%,  < 0.01) or sagittal plane reconstruction > 3 degrees outside of an optimized range (20.2 vs. 9.9%,  = 0.06). Aseptic revisions occurred more frequently with the CR CIM-TKA design (9.6 vs. 3.3%,  = 0.13). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different between the treatment groups. CR CIM-TKA may improve kinematic performance for patients undergoing knee replacement surgery. However, our study observations suggest that careful attention to surgical technique is important for optimizing implant survivorship with the CR CIM-TKA design. Additional study is needed to determine whether higher revision rates identified during this study are related to patient selection, surgical technique, or implant design.