Poulsen J S, Olesen F, Hekmati P, Bakshodeh G A
Acta Vet Scand. 1988;29(1):135-7. doi: 10.1186/BF03548403.
The sampling method used is of great importance for the estimation of the microbial activity and biochemical status in ruminal fluid (ö 1958, 1974, 1984). Several methods have been used for sampling of ruminal fluid in non-fistulated animals (ø 1955, 1958, 1958, 1971). However, the conventional methods of collecting ruminal fluid either by stomach tube (Thygesen probe with a filter ad modum ø (1955)), or through a puncture low in the left flank, do not produce representative samples comparable in quality or quantity to samples collected directly through a rumen fistula. The puncture methods usually produce a very small volume of material, and they often leave the cow with an inflammatory reaction in the flank. Many research workers have demonstrated contamination with saliva in samples drawn through a peroral stomach tube, resulting inter alia in a higher pH value than in samples collected through fistula ( 1970, 1984). Since changes in the fermentative reactions of high-yielding cows are receiving much research emphasis today, it has been our aim to construct an instrument suitable for collecting single or continuous samples for diagnostic as well as research purposes, which are comparable in quality and quantity to samples obtained through a rumen fistula. The idea of making the naso-ruminal sampler was inspired by the construction of the COMET Naso-Reticular Instrument ( 1985).
所采用的采样方法对于瘤胃液中微生物活性和生化状态的评估至关重要(ö 1958年、1974年、1984年)。已使用多种方法对未安装瘘管的动物采集瘤胃液(ø 1955年、1958年、1958年、1971年)。然而,通过胃管(如Thygesen探针加过滤器,模式ø (1955))或通过左腹下部穿刺来采集瘤胃液的传统方法,无法获得与通过瘤胃瘘管直接采集的样本在质量或数量上可比的代表性样本。穿刺方法通常采集到的样本量非常小,而且常常会使奶牛的侧腹出现炎症反应。许多研究人员已证明,通过经口胃管抽取的样本会被唾液污染,尤其是导致pH值高于通过瘘管采集的样本(1970年、1984年)。由于高产奶牛发酵反应的变化如今受到大量研究关注,我们的目标是构建一种适合采集单个或连续样本用于诊断及研究目的的仪器,其样本在质量和数量上与通过瘤胃瘘管获得的样本相当。制作鼻-瘤胃采样器的想法是受到COMET鼻-网胃仪器(1985年)构造的启发。