Universidade Federal de Uberlândia - UFU, School of Dentistry, Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthesis and Dental Materials, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia - UFU, Physics Institute, Laboratory of New Insulating and Semiconductor Materials, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Jan 31;34:e004. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0004. eCollection 2020.
The aim of this study was to analyze the structural, morphological and mechanical properties of two different lithium disilicate glass-reinforced ceramics for CAD-CAM systems (IPS e.max CAD and Rosetta SM). Five methodologies were used for both ceramics: microstructure (n = 2) was analyzed using x-ray diffraction (XRD); morphological properties (n = 2) were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), with and without hydrofluoric etching; porosity (n = 3) was assessed using 3D micro-computed tomography (micro-CT); flexural strength was measured (n =1 0) using the three-point bending test; and bond strength was determined with self-adhesive resin cement (n = 10), using a microshear bond test. After performing all the tests, the data were analyzed using t-Student test and two-way ANOVA. All the tests used a significance level of α = 0.05. High peak positions corresponding to standard lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate with similar intensities were observed for both ceramics in the XRD analysis. Morphological analysis showed that the crystalline structure of the two ceramics studied showed no statistical difference after acid etching. Additionally, no significant differences were recorded in the number or size of the pores for the ceramics evaluated. Moreover, no differences in flexural strength were found for the ceramic materials tested, or in the bond strength to ceramic substrates for the resin cements. Based on the study results, no significant differences were found between the two CAD-CAM lithium disilicate glass-reinforced ceramics tested, since they presented similar crystalline structures with comparable intensities, and similar total porosity, flexural strength and bond strength.
本研究旨在分析两种不同的用于 CAD-CAM 系统的锂硅玻璃增强陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD 和 Rosetta SM)的结构、形态和机械性能。对这两种陶瓷分别采用了 5 种方法:采用 X 射线衍射(XRD)分析微观结构(n = 2);采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析形态特性(n = 2),并分别进行和未进行氢氟酸蚀刻;采用三维微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估孔隙率(n = 3);采用三点弯曲试验测量弯曲强度(n = 10);采用自粘接树脂水泥测定结合强度(n = 10),采用微剪切结合试验。进行所有测试后,使用 t-Student 检验和双向方差分析对数据进行分析。所有测试的显著水平均为α = 0.05。XRD 分析表明,两种陶瓷均观察到对应标准锂硅酸钠和锂硅玻璃的高峰值位置,且强度相似。形态分析表明,经酸蚀后,研究的两种陶瓷的晶体结构无统计学差异。此外,评估的陶瓷的孔隙数量或大小也无显著差异。而且,所测试的陶瓷材料的弯曲强度以及树脂水泥对陶瓷基底的结合强度均无差异。根据研究结果,两种测试的 CAD-CAM 锂硅玻璃增强陶瓷之间未发现显著差异,因为它们具有相似的晶体结构和强度,且总孔隙率、弯曲强度和结合强度也相似。