• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于荟萃诊断测试准确性 (DTA) 研究的斜正态随机效应模型。

Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Biom J. 2020 Sep;62(5):1223-1244. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900184. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.201900184
PMID:32022315
Abstract

Hierarchical models are recommended for meta-analyzing diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies. The bivariate random-effects model is currently widely used to synthesize a pair of test sensitivity and specificity using logit transformation across studies. This model assumes a bivariate normal distribution for the random-effects. However, this assumption is restrictive and can be violated. When the assumption fails, inferences could be misleading. In this paper, we extended the current bivariate random-effects model by assuming a flexible bivariate skew-normal distribution for the random-effects in order to robustly model logit sensitivities and logit specificities. The marginal distribution of the proposed model is analytically derived so that parameter estimation can be performed using standard likelihood methods. The method of weighted-average is adopted to estimate the overall logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity. An extensive simulation study is carried out to investigate the performance of the proposed model compared to other standard models. Overall, the proposed model performs better in terms of confidence interval width of the average logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity compared to the standard bivariate linear mixed model and bivariate generalized linear mixed model. Simulations have also shown that the proposed model performed better than the well-established bivariate linear mixed model in terms of bias and comparable with regards to the root mean squared error (RMSE) of the between-study (co)variances. The proposed method is also illustrated using a published meta-analysis data.

摘要

层级模型被推荐用于荟萃分析诊断测试准确性(DTA)研究。目前,双变量随机效应模型被广泛用于使用对数转换对来自不同研究的一对测试灵敏度和特异性进行综合。该模型假设随机效应的双变量正态分布。然而,该假设是限制性的,并且可能会被违反。当假设失败时,推断可能会产生误导。在本文中,我们通过假设随机效应的灵活双变量偏斜正态分布来扩展当前的双变量随机效应模型,以便稳健地对对数敏感和对数特异性进行建模。所提出模型的边缘分布是通过解析推导得出的,因此可以使用标准似然方法进行参数估计。采用加权平均法来估计整体对数转换的敏感性和特异性。进行了广泛的模拟研究,以调查与其他标准模型相比,所提出模型的性能。总体而言,与标准的双变量线性混合模型和双变量广义线性混合模型相比,所提出的模型在平均对数转换敏感性和特异性的置信区间宽度方面表现更好。模拟还表明,在所研究的(协)方差的偏差方面,该模型比既定的双变量线性混合模型表现更好,并且在 RMSE 方面具有可比性。还使用已发表的荟萃分析数据说明了该方法。

相似文献

1
Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.用于荟萃诊断测试准确性 (DTA) 研究的斜正态随机效应模型。
Biom J. 2020 Sep;62(5):1223-1244. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900184. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
2
Robust bivariate random-effects model for accommodating outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.稳健双变量随机效应模型在诊断性试验准确性研究荟萃分析中处理离群值和有影响力的研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3308-3325. doi: 10.1177/0962280220925840. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
4
A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method.一种新的综合测试精度数据的方法优于双变量法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Apr;132:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.12.015. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
5
Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models.二变量随机效应 meta 分析在广义线性混合模型在诊断研究中的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):499-508. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09353452. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
6
Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis models for diagnostic test accuracy studies using arcsine-based transformations.使用基于反正弦变换的诊断试验准确性研究的双变量随机效应荟萃分析模型。
Biom J. 2018 Jul;60(4):827-844. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700101. Epub 2018 May 11.
7
[Comparison of simple pooling and bivariate model used in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in Chinese journals].[中文期刊发表的诊断试验准确性Meta分析中简单合并法与双变量模型的比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Jun 18;47(3):483-8.
8
A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.一种使用随机效应分布的Copula表示法对诊断试验准确性研究进行双变量Meta分析的混合效应模型。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 20;34(29):3842-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.6595. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
9
A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.一种用于诊断准确性研究的双变量随机效应荟萃分析的双SIMEX方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0284-2.
10
A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.一种用于诊断试验准确性多变量荟萃分析的简单且稳健的方法。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):105-121. doi: 10.1002/sim.7093. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bivariate Finite Mixture Random Effects Model for Identifying and Accommodating Outliers in Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analyses.一种用于诊断试验准确性荟萃分析中识别和处理异常值的双变量有限混合随机效应模型。
Biom J. 2025 Jun;67(3):e70062. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70062.
2
An evaluation of computational methods for aggregate data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.汇总数据诊断试验准确性研究的综合分析的计算方法评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 10;24(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02217-2.