Department of Psychology, Sunway University, Jalan Universiti, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Centre for American Education, Sunway University, Jalan Universiti, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Psych J. 2020 Oct;9(5):668-681. doi: 10.1002/pchj.345. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
With a leader being able to possess different types of leadership styles, there is a lack of literature investigating which leadership style best facilitates supervisory coaching behavior. The current study aimed to investigate which leadership style would exhibit supervisory coaching behavior, and if supervisory coaching behavior would mediate the relationship between leadership styles and job performance. The study compared the effects of three leadership styles-transformational, transactional, and empowering leadership-on supervisory coaching behavior, which has been reported to influence job performance. A multilevel approach was adopted in this study using 500 employees from 65 organizations within Malaysia. The study found that only empowering and transactional leadership styles exhibited supervisory coaching behavior, which in turn mediated their relationships with job performance. Overall, the findings suggest the importance of leadership styles that prioritize employee development, as these would lead to improved job performance in employees.
如果领导者能够拥有不同类型的领导风格,那么就缺乏文献来研究哪种领导风格最有利于促进监督指导行为。本研究旨在探讨哪种领导风格会表现出监督指导行为,以及监督指导行为是否会调解领导风格和工作绩效之间的关系。本研究比较了三种领导风格——变革型领导、交易型领导和授权型领导——对监督指导行为的影响,因为监督指导行为被报告可以影响工作绩效。本研究采用多层次方法,使用马来西亚 65 家组织的 500 名员工。研究发现,只有授权型领导和交易型领导风格表现出监督指导行为,而这种行为反过来又调解了它们与工作绩效的关系。总的来说,研究结果表明,重视员工发展的领导风格非常重要,因为这将导致员工的工作绩效得到提高。