Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920557. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20557.
Parents may use screen exposure or screen exposure combined with feeding for infants and toddlers to alleviate their own stress.
To evaluate the association of individual and contextual stressors with child screen exposure (CSE) and CSE combined with feeding (CSE+F) in children aged 7 to 18 months as measured by parent-reported use and variation in quantity of CSE and CSE+F.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional, population-based study drew parent-child participants from TARGet Kids, a network of primary health care research settings throughout Toronto, Ontario, Canada, between November 1, 2011, and July 31, 2018. The included children were aged 7 to 18 months. Exclusion criteria were health conditions affecting growth, acute conditions, chronic conditions, severe developmental delay, and families who were unable to communicate in the English language. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2019, to July 31, 2019.
Parenting stress, child age, child negative affectivity, family living arrangements, and family income were assessed with parent-completed questionnaires.
The primary outcome was CSE and the variation in CSE, which represented the amount of background and engaged use of screens (television, videos or DVDs, video games, computers, and mobile devices) in a typical week. The secondary outcome was CSE+F, which represented the frequency of breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snack consumption during screen exposure in a typical week. Both CSE and CSE+F were assessed with the parent-completed Nutrition and Health Questionnaire; Infant Behavior Questionnaire, Revised Very Short; and Parenting Stress Index, Short Form.
The final sample size was 1085 children for the analysis of CSE and 1083 children for the analysis of CSE+F. Among 914 respondents, the children's mean (SD) age was 11.6 (2.3) months, and 478 (52.3%) were male. Among 910 respondents, 839 (92.2%) were mothers, with a mean (SD) age among 873 respondents of 34.4 (4.2) years. In a typical week, 581 of 779 children (74.6%) were reported to have any CSE, and 321 of 874 children (36.7%) had some CSE+F. Higher parenting stress levels (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .04) and older child age (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03; P = .04) were associated with CSE. Higher parenting stress levels (incidence rate [IR], 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = .002) and lower household income (IR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.45; P = .01) were associated with increased CSE. Older child age (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.35-2.38; P < .001) and lower household income (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.72-3.74; P < .001) were associated with CSE+F. Lower household income (IR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.42; P = .02) was associated with increased CSE+F.
This study found that parenting stress, income, and child age were associated with CSE, and child age and household income were associated with CSE+F. Given these findings, interventions to improve parental coping mechanisms may decrease child screen exposure.
父母可能会使用屏幕暴露或屏幕暴露与喂养相结合的方式来缓解自己的压力。
评估个体和环境压力源与 7 至 18 个月大的儿童的屏幕暴露(CSE)和 CSE 与喂养相结合(CSE+F)之间的关系,通过父母报告的 CSE 和 CSE+F 的使用量和数量变化来衡量。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项横断面、基于人群的研究,从加拿大安大略省多伦多市的主要医疗保健研究环境网络 TARGet Kids 中招募了父母和孩子的参与者,时间为 2011 年 11 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 31 日。纳入的儿童年龄为 7 至 18 个月。排除标准为影响生长的健康状况、急性疾病、慢性疾病、严重发育迟缓以及无法用英语交流的家庭。数据分析于 2019 年 4 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日进行。
育儿压力、儿童年龄、儿童负性情绪、家庭生活安排和家庭收入均采用父母完成的问卷进行评估。
主要结果是 CSE 和 CSE 的变化,这代表了一周内背景和参与屏幕使用(电视、视频或 DVD、视频游戏、电脑和移动设备)的数量。次要结果是 CSE+F,代表了一周内屏幕暴露期间早餐、午餐、晚餐和零食摄入的频率。CSE 和 CSE+F 均采用父母完成的营养和健康问卷、婴儿行为问卷修订版和育儿压力指数短表进行评估。
在对 CSE 的分析中,最终样本量为 1085 名儿童,在对 CSE+F 的分析中,最终样本量为 1083 名儿童。在 914 名应答者中,儿童的平均(SD)年龄为 11.6(2.3)个月,478 名(52.3%)为男性。在 910 名应答者中,839 名(92.2%)为母亲,其中 873 名应答者的平均(SD)年龄为 34.4(4.2)岁。在典型的一周内,报告有 581 名(74.6%)儿童有任何 CSE,321 名(36.7%)儿童有一些 CSE+F。较高的育儿压力水平(优势比[OR],1.01;95%置信区间,1.00-1.02;P=0.04)和较大的儿童年龄(OR,1.43;95%置信区间,1.01-2.03;P=0.04)与 CSE 相关。较高的育儿压力水平(发病率[IR],1.00;95%置信区间,1.00-1.01;P=0.002)和较低的家庭收入(IR,1.26;95%置信区间,1.10-1.45;P=0.01)与 CSE 增加相关。较大的儿童年龄(OR,1.79;95%置信区间,1.35-2.38;P<0.001)和较低的家庭收入(OR,2.54;95%置信区间,1.72-3.74;P<0.001)与 CSE+F 相关。较低的家庭收入(IR,1.21;95%置信区间,1.03-1.42;P=0.02)与 CSE+F 增加相关。
本研究发现,育儿压力、收入和儿童年龄与 CSE 相关,儿童年龄和家庭收入与 CSE+F 相关。鉴于这些发现,改善父母应对机制的干预措施可能会减少儿童的屏幕暴露。