• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹腹腔镜主动脉旁淋巴结切除术与体重指数:它真的是该手术的限制因素吗?

Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy and Body Mass Index: Is It Really a Limiting Factor for the Procedure?

作者信息

Reyes Claret Albert, Martínez Canto María Cristina, Robles Gourley Ana, Llull Gomila Marina, Martín Jiménez Ángel

机构信息

Gynecologic Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Hospital Comarcal d'Inca, Inca, Spain.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):416-422. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0529. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2019.0529
PMID:32023169
Abstract

To explore if obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m represents a limiting factor for para-aortic lymphadenectomy done with a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Retrospective observational study with 146 consecutive patients, diagnosed with a gynecological cancer submitted to para-aortic surgical staging between January 2010 and December 2018. The mean age was 52 years and the mean BMI was 27 kg/m. 72.6% (106 patients) had BMI <30 kg/m and 27.4% (40 patients) had BMI ≥30 kg/m. Half of the patients did not have prior abdominal surgeries. The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between two groups depending on their BMI in the lymph node count: BMI <30 kg/m 14 nodes versus BMI ≥30 kg/m 10 nodes ( = .122); rate of intraoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.3% versus BMI ≥30: 0% ( = .180), postoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.6% versus BMI ≥30: 5% ( = .723); feasibility rate: BMI <30: 97.1% versus BMI ≥30: 95.6% ( = .063) or the mean hospital stay BMI <30: 2.47 ± 2.05 days (standard deviation [SD]), BMI ≥30: 2.64 ± 0.93 days (SD) ( = .171). The only significant difference observed was due to the operating time: BMI <30: 103.1 ± 60.8 (SD) versus BMI ≥30: 146.9 ± 82.5 (SD) ( = .019), being longer in obese patients. Obesity, estimated by BMI, does not seem to represent a limiting factor for this surgical procedure in our series. We feel it is a feasible and justified approach in obese patients when other surgical procedures have to be carried out in the same surgical act. Probably, other factors and anthropometric measurements are more accurate to select patients in which this approach is feasible.

摘要

探讨以体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m²衡量的肥胖是否是经腹腹腔镜主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术的限制因素。对2010年1月至2018年12月期间连续146例被诊断为妇科癌症并接受主动脉旁手术分期的患者进行回顾性观察研究。平均年龄为52岁,平均BMI为27kg/m²。72.6%(106例患者)的BMI<30kg/m²,27.4%(40例患者)的BMI≥30kg/m²。一半的患者既往没有腹部手术史。统计分析表明,根据BMI分组,两组在淋巴结计数方面无显著差异:BMI<30kg/m²组为14个淋巴结,BMI≥30kg/m²组为10个淋巴结(P = 0.122);术中并发症发生率:BMI<30组为6.3%,BMI≥30组为0%(P = 0.180),术后并发症发生率:BMI<30组为6.6%,BMI≥30组为5%(P = 0.723);可行性率:BMI<30组为97.1%,BMI≥30组为95.6%(P = 0.063),或平均住院时间BMI<30组为2.47±2.05天(标准差[SD]),BMI≥30组为2.64±0.93天(SD)(P = 0.171)。观察到的唯一显著差异是手术时间:BMI<30组为103.1±60.8(SD),BMI≥30组为146.9±82.5(SD)(P = 0.019),肥胖患者的手术时间更长。在我们的系列研究中,以BMI评估的肥胖似乎不是该手术的限制因素。当在同一手术操作中必须进行其他手术时,我们认为这对肥胖患者是一种可行且合理的方法。可能,其他因素和人体测量指标对于选择可行该方法的患者更为准确。

相似文献

1
Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy and Body Mass Index: Is It Really a Limiting Factor for the Procedure?经腹腹腔镜主动脉旁淋巴结切除术与体重指数:它真的是该手术的限制因素吗?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):416-422. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0529. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?单对接机器人辅助腹腔镜经腹膜后入路肾下淋巴结清扫术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌:我们是否需要备用手术方案?
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0685-1. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies.经腹与腹膜外腹腔镜下妇科恶性肿瘤腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术的比较
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Feb;22(2):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
4
Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.机器人辅助腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术:手术结果:487例患者的队列研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Mar;25(3):504-11. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000373.
5
Comparison of surgical and pathological parameters after laparoscopic transperitoneal pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomies.腹腔镜经腹腔盆/腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术后手术和病理参数的比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1798-1802. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001677. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies.妇科肿瘤中心经腹淋巴结清扫术的引入:650例腹腔镜盆腔和/或腹主动脉旁经腹淋巴结清扫术分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Oct;95(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.025.
7
Single-port laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy.经单孔腹腔镜腹膜外途径施行腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Nov;23(9):1712-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000006.
8
Robotic-assisted Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Gynecological Malignancies: Comparison with a Laparoscopic Approach.机器人辅助经腹肾下主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术治疗妇科恶性肿瘤:与腹腔镜手术方法的比较
Anticancer Res. 2017 Dec;37(12):7087-7093. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12182.
9
Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure.双重对接在改善淋巴结清扫中的作用:当机器人辅助腹腔镜腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术与盆腔手术联合进行时。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):331-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000338.
10
Comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopy for transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.机器人辅助与腹腔镜用于子宫内膜癌患者经腹膜途径肾下主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Mar;44(3):547-555. doi: 10.1111/jog.13535. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.传统腹腔镜检查与机器人辅助主动脉旁淋巴结分期用于局部晚期宫颈癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 10;11(12):3332. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123332.