One versus two-handed lifting and lowering: lumbar spine loads and recommended one-handed limits protecting the lower back.

The objectives of this study were to quantify loads imposed upon the lumbar spine while lifting/lowering with one versus two hands and to create guidelines for one-handed lifting/lowering that are protective of the lower back. Thirty subjects (15 male, 15 female) performed one- and two-handed exertions in a laboratory, lifting from/lowering to 18 lift origins/destinations using medicine balls of varying masses. An electromyography-assisted model predicted peak spinal loads, which were related to tissue tolerance limits to create recommended weight limits. Compared to two-handed exertions, one-handed exertions resulted in decreased spinal compression and A/P shear loading ( < 0.001) but increased lateral shear ( < 0.001). Effects were likely driven by altered moment exposures attributable to altered torso kinematics. Differences between spinal loads for one- versus two-handed exertions were influenced by asymmetry ( < 0.001) and amplified at lower lift origin/destination heights, lower object masses and larger horizontal distances between the body and the load ( < 0.001). A biomechanical model was utilised to compare spinal loading for one versus two-handed lifting/lowering. Spinal loads in compression and A/P shear were reduced for one-handed relative to two-handed exertions. As current lifting guidelines cannot appropriately be applied to one-handed scenarios, one-handed weight limits protecting the lower back are presented herein. LBD: low back disorder, EMG: electromyography, A/P: anterior/posterior, MVC: maximum voluntary contraction.