Shin Seung Hwan, Park Sung Soo, Yoon Jae Ho, Yahng Seung Ah, Lee Sung Eun, Cho Byung Sik, Eom Ki Sung, Kim Yoo Jin, Lee Seok, Min Chang Ki, Kim Hee Je, Cho Seok Goo, Lee Jong Wook
Department of Hematology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Hematology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Aug;55(8):1570-1579. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0820-x. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
The recent improvements in the outcomes of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from unrelated donors (URD) suggest the possibility of its alternative first-line treatment. To address this issue, results of adult SAA patients receiving allogeneic SCT were compared between the following three donor-type groups: 8/8-matched sibling (MSD; n = 153), 8/8 well-matched unrelated (WM-URD; n = 72), and 6-7/8 partially matched unrelated (PM-URD; n = 33). Proportion of patients who experienced immunosuppressive treatment failures was significantly higher in the URD groups than in the MSD group (P< 0.01). The incidences of graft failure and transplant-related mortality, and graft-vs.-host disease-free, failure-free survival rates of the MSD, WM-URD, and PM-URD groups were 14.6, 0, and 0% (P< 0.01); 6.1, 10.3, and 21.7% (P= 0.03); and 76.7, 55.5, and 51.5% (P< 0.01), respectively. The overall survival (OS) rate of the MSD group (93.9%) was higher than that of the PM-URD (78.3%; P < 0.01) group, but not to that of the WM-URD (86.2%; P= 0.18) group. Our study showed comparable OS between the MSD group and WM-URD group, which suggest that the URD-SCT can be used as a first-line treatment for adult SAA patients with WM-URD.
接受来自无关供体(URD)的异基因干细胞移植(SCT)的重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者近期预后有所改善,这表明其作为一线治疗方案具有可能性。为解决这一问题,我们比较了以下三组供体类型的成年SAA患者接受异基因SCT的结果:8/8匹配同胞供体(MSD;n = 153)、8/8全相合无关供体(WM-URD;n = 72)和6-7/8部分相合无关供体(PM-URD;n = 33)。URD组中经历免疫抑制治疗失败的患者比例显著高于MSD组(P<0.01)。MSD组、WM-URD组和PM-URD组的移植失败率、移植相关死亡率以及无移植物抗宿主病、无失败生存率分别为14.6%、0%和0%(P<0.01);6.1%、10.3%和21.7%(P = 0.03);以及76.7%、55.5%和51.5%(P<0.01)。MSD组的总生存率(OS)(93.9%)高于PM-URD组(78.3%;P<0.01),但与WM-URD组(86.2%;P = 0.18)相比无显著差异。我们的研究表明MSD组和WM-URD组的OS相当,这表明URD-SCT可作为成年WM-URD型SAA患者的一线治疗方案。