• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.

作者信息

Reed Chris, Budzynska Katarzyna, Duthie Rory, Janier Mathilde, Konat Barbara, Lawrence John, Pease Alison, Snaith Mark

机构信息

1Centre for Argument Technology, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN UK.

2Centre for Argument Technology, IFiS PAN, ul. Nowy Swiat 72, 00-330 Warszawa, Poland.

出版信息

Philos Technol. 2017;30(2):137-160. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0260-8. Epub 2017 May 11.

DOI:10.1007/s13347-017-0260-8
PMID:32025475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6979725/
Abstract

The Argument Web is maturing as both a platform built upon a synthesis of many contemporary theories of argumentation in philosophy and also as an ecosystem in which various applications and application components are contributed by different research groups around the world. It already hosts the largest publicly accessible corpora of argumentation and has the largest number of interoperable and cross compatible tools for the analysis, navigation and evaluation of arguments across a broad range of domains, languages and activity types. Such interoperability is key in allowing innovative combinations of tool and data reuse that can further catalyse the development of the field of computational argumentation. The aim of this paper is to summarise the key foundations, the recent advances and the goals of the Argument Web, with a particular focus on demonstrating the relevance to, and roots in, philosophical argumentation theory.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/6714737ddd1f/13347_2017_260_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/2fd2d454ede9/13347_2017_260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/1198bed4bd0b/13347_2017_260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/1060504e054a/13347_2017_260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/8d7a5becb02a/13347_2017_260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/d100cbde9694/13347_2017_260_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/a58a2c4ec9d3/13347_2017_260_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/5c71b1e3f657/13347_2017_260_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/6714737ddd1f/13347_2017_260_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/2fd2d454ede9/13347_2017_260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/1198bed4bd0b/13347_2017_260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/1060504e054a/13347_2017_260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/8d7a5becb02a/13347_2017_260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/d100cbde9694/13347_2017_260_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/a58a2c4ec9d3/13347_2017_260_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/5c71b1e3f657/13347_2017_260_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e05/6979725/6714737ddd1f/13347_2017_260_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.
Philos Technol. 2017;30(2):137-160. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0260-8. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
Annotating Argument Schemes.注释论证模式
Argumentation. 2021;35(1):101-139. doi: 10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x. Epub 2020 May 7.
3
Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.走向论证的实验性阐释：滑坡论证与诉诸人身论证的案例
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 15;5:1420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01420. eCollection 2014.
4
How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review.论证理论如何为评估效度提供信息：批判性评价。
Med Educ. 2022 Nov;56(11):1064-1075. doi: 10.1111/medu.14882. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
5
Legitimation Without Argumentation: An Empirical Discourse Analysis of 'Validity as an Argument' in Assessment.无需论证的合法化：评估中“有效性即论证”的实证话语分析。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Oct 3;13(1):469-480. doi: 10.5334/pme.1404. eCollection 2024.
6
Sketching the vision of the Web of Debates.勾勒辩论网络的愿景。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jun 16;6:1124045. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1124045. eCollection 2023.
7
Developing a Conversational Agent's Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin's Model of Arguments.基于图尔敏论证模型开发对话代理识别论证中结构错误的能力。
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Nov 30;4:645516. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.645516. eCollection 2021.
8
The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.人类基因工程伦理争论中的滑坡论证。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1507-1528. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9861-3. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
9
The effectiveness of argumentation in tutorial dialogues with an Intelligent Tutoring System for genetic risk of breast cancer.在与用于乳腺癌遗传风险的智能辅导系统进行的辅导对话中论证的有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):857-68. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0681-1.
10
Argudas: lessons for argumentation in biology based on a gene expression use case.阿古达斯：基于基因表达用例的生物学论证的教训。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jan 25;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S1-S8.

引用本文的文献

1
Sketching the vision of the Web of Debates.勾勒辩论网络的愿景。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jun 16;6:1124045. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1124045. eCollection 2023.