Suppr超能文献

利用技术填补初级保健共同决策差距的机会:一项混合方法需求评估。

Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment.

作者信息

Misra Anjali J, Ong Shawn Y, Gokhale Arjun, Khan Sameer, Melnick Edward R

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2019 Jul 31;2(4):447-455. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz027. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze current practices in shared decision-making (SDM) in primary care and perform a needs assessment for the role of information technology (IT) interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mixed-methods study was conducted in three phases: (1) ethnographic observation of clinical encounters, (2) patient interviews, and (3) physician interviews. SDM was measured using the validated OPTION scale. Semistructured interviews followed an interview guide (developed by our multidisciplinary team) informed by the Traditional Decision Conflict Scale and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire. Field notes were independently coded and analyzed by two reviewers in Dedoose.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patient encounters were observed in 3 diverse practices with an average OPTION score of 57.2 (0-100 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51.8-62.6). Twenty-two patient and 8 physician interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Cohen's kappa, measuring coder agreement, was 0.42. Patient domains were: establishing trust, influence of others, flexibility, frustrations, values, and preferences. Physician domains included frustrations, technology (concerns, existing use, and desires), and decision making (current methods used, challenges, and patients' understanding).

DISCUSSION

Given low SDM observed, multiple opportunities for technology to enhance SDM exist based on specific OPTION items that received lower scores, including: (1) checking the patient's preferred information format, (2) asking the patient's preferred level of involvement in decision making, and (3) providing an opportunity for deferring a decision. Based on data from interviews, patients and physicians value information exchange and are open to technologies that enhance communication of care options.

CONCLUSION

Future primary care IT platforms should prioritize the 3 quantitative gaps identified to improve physician-patient communication and relationships. Additionally, SDM tools should seek to standardize common workflow steps across decisions and focus on barriers to increasing adoption of effective SDM tools into routine primary care.

摘要

目的

分析初级保健中共同决策(SDM)的当前实践情况,并对信息技术(IT)干预措施的作用进行需求评估。

材料与方法

开展了一项混合方法研究,分三个阶段进行:(1)对临床诊疗过程进行人种学观察,(2)对患者进行访谈,(3)对医生进行访谈。使用经过验证的OPTION量表来衡量共同决策。半结构化访谈遵循由我们的多学科团队制定的访谈指南,该指南以传统决策冲突量表和共同决策问卷为依据。两名审阅者在Dedoose中对实地记录进行独立编码和分析。

结果

在3种不同的诊疗机构中观察了24次患者诊疗过程,OPTION平均得分为57.2(0 - 100分制;95%置信区间[CI],51.8 - 62.6)。进行了22次患者访谈和8次医生访谈,直至达到主题饱和。衡量编码者一致性的科恩kappa系数为0.42。患者方面的领域包括:建立信任、他人的影响、灵活性、挫折感、价值观和偏好。医生方面的领域包括挫折感、技术(担忧、现有使用情况和期望)以及决策制定(当前使用的方法、挑战和患者的理解)。

讨论

鉴于观察到的共同决策水平较低,基于得分较低的特定OPTION项目,技术有多个机会来增强共同决策,包括:(1)询问患者偏好的信息格式,(2)询问患者偏好的参与决策程度,以及(3)提供推迟决策的机会。根据访谈数据,患者和医生重视信息交流,并对能够增强护理选择沟通的技术持开放态度。

结论

未来的初级保健IT平台应优先处理所确定的3个量化差距,以改善医患沟通和关系。此外,共同决策工具应寻求规范不同决策中的常见工作流程步骤,并关注将有效的共同决策工具纳入常规初级保健的采用障碍。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Shared decision making: relevant concepts and facilitating strategies.共同决策:相关概念与促进策略。
Epidemiol Health. 2017 Oct 30;39:e2017048. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2017048. eCollection 2017.
7
The HITECH Era in Retrospect.回顾医疗信息技术经济与临床健康法案时代
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 7;377(10):907-909. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1709851.
9
Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians.医疗保健领域的技术应用:医生的见解
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 27;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0489-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验