College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom.
Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.08.013. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) as a measure of physical activity (PA) in young people with cerebral palsy (CP).
Cross-sectional.
Participants were recruited through 8 National Health Service (NHS) trusts, one school, one university and through organisations that provide services for people with disabilities in England.
Sixty-four, ambulatory young people aged 10-19 years with CP [Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-III] participated in this study.
The IPAQ-SF was administered to participants. Participants were then asked to wear a wGT3X-BT triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) for 7 days to objectively assess PA. Time spent in sedentary behaviour, in moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) and in total PA (TPA) was compared between measures.
Young people with CP self-reported less time in sedentary behaviour and underestimated the time spent in TPA, when compared to accelerometer measurements. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated poor agreement between the measures for MVPA, with upper and lower 95% limits of agreement of -147 to 148.9minute. After adjusting for gender and GMFCS level, age was a predictor of the difference between measures for MVPA (P<0.001) and TPA (P<0.001).
These findings suggest that the IPAQ-SF is not a valid method of measuring TPA or sedentary behaviour in young people with CP and it is not appropriate for use when assessing an individual's time in MVPA. Therefore, where feasible, an objective measure of PA should be used.
ISRCTN90378161.
本研究旨在检验国际体力活动问卷短表(IPAQ-SF)作为评估脑瘫(CP)青少年体力活动(PA)的有效性。
横断面研究。
参与者通过 8 家国民保健制度(NHS)信托、1 所学校、1 所大学以及为英格兰残障人士提供服务的组织招募。
本研究纳入了 64 名 10-19 岁、能行走的 CP 青少年(粗大运动功能分级系统(GMFCS)I-III 级)。
向参与者发放 IPAQ-SF。然后要求参与者佩戴三轴加速度计(ActiGraph,彭萨科拉,FL)7 天以客观评估 PA。比较了两种方法测量的久坐行为、中高强度 PA(MVPA)和总 PA(TPA)时间。
CP 青少年自我报告的久坐时间较少,与加速度计测量值相比,TPA 时间被低估。Bland-Altman 图显示 MVPA 两种方法的一致性较差,95%一致性界限的上下限为-147 至 148.9 分钟。调整性别和 GMFCS 水平后,年龄是 MVPA 和 TPA 两种方法测量值之间差异的预测因素(P<0.001)。
这些发现表明,在 CP 青少年中,IPAQ-SF 不是测量 TPA 或久坐行为的有效方法,也不适合评估个体的 MVPA 时间。因此,在可行的情况下,应使用客观的 PA 测量方法。
ISRCTN90378161。