Rivera-Herrera Robert Stick, Esparza-Villalpando Vicente, Bermeo-Escalona Josué Roberto, Martínez-Rider Ricardo, Pozos-Guillén Amaury
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Facultad de Estomatología, San Luis Potosí Guanajuato. México.
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Ingeniería y Ciencia de Materiales, San Luis Potosí Guanajuato. México.
Gac Med Mex. 2020;156(1):22-26. doi: 10.24875/GMM.19005113.
Pell & Gregory and Winter classifications are basic in third molar categorization; Sánchez-Torres classification is used in Mexico, but it has not been previously evaluated.
To assess the degree of agreement in the radiographic evaluation of impacted mandibular third molar with the use of three classifications: Pell & Gregory, Winter and Sánchez-Torres.
Observational, descriptive, inter-observer degree of agreement study that included 10 oral and maxillofacial surgeons and 10 training residents, who recorded the radiographic categorization of third mandibular molars (left and right) according to Pell and Gregory, Sánchez-Torres and Winter classifications. Inter-observer degree of agreement was assessed with Fleiss' kappa test.
Pell and Gregory classification obtained the lowest degree of agreement (kappa = 0.05 and 0.185), followed by Sánchez-Torres classification (kappa = 0.125 and 0.326); Winter had the best agreement, with kappa = 0.28 and 0.636 for oral and maxillofacial surgeons and training residents, respectively.
The Winter classification showed an acceptable (moderate) degree of agreement to classify mandibular third molars by training residents.
佩尔和格雷戈里分类法以及温特分类法是第三磨牙分类的基础;桑切斯 - 托雷斯分类法在墨西哥使用,但此前尚未得到评估。
使用佩尔和格雷戈里分类法、温特分类法以及桑切斯 - 托雷斯分类法,评估在影像学评估下颌阻生第三磨牙时的一致性程度。
进行观察性、描述性、观察者间一致性程度研究,纳入10名口腔颌面外科医生和10名实习住院医师,他们根据佩尔和格雷戈里分类法、桑切斯 - 托雷斯分类法以及温特分类法记录下颌第三磨牙(左右两侧)的影像学分类。使用弗莱iss卡方检验评估观察者间的一致性程度。
佩尔和格雷戈里分类法的一致性程度最低(卡方值分别为0.05和0.185),其次是桑切斯 - 托雷斯分类法(卡方值分别为0.125和0.326);温特分类法的一致性最好,口腔颌面外科医生和实习住院医师的卡方值分别为0.28和0.636。
温特分类法在实习住院医师对下颌第三磨牙进行分类时显示出可接受的(中等)一致性程度。