Promsri Arunee, Haid Thomas, Federolf Peter
Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Fürstenweg 185 A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Phayao, 19 Moo 2 Maeka, Muang, Phayao 56000, Thailand.
Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Fürstenweg 185 A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Neuroscience. 2020 Mar 15;430:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
The current project investigated the dynamics of postural movements and muscle activity during balancing with feet-together and feet-apart positions on different support surfaces (firm surface (FS), modified- and conventional balance boards). We hypothesized that movement complexity and muscle activation would increase with increased balance-task difficulty, and that differences in the composition and control of postural movements between bipedal wide- and narrow-based balancing would be observed in all surface conditions. We applied a principal component analysis (PCA) to decompose postural movement trajectories of 26 active-young adults into sets of movement components (principal movements; PMs). Three PCA-based variables were calculated for each PM: the cumulative relative variance as a measure of movement complexity; the relative explained variance as a measure of the composition of postural movements; and the PM-acceleration as a measure for the control of the movement components. The main results revealed that both movement complexity and muscle activity increased with increased balance-task difficulty, of which altering support surfaces yielded more and greater effects than changing feet positions. Only on the FS, different movement structures were observed between narrowed- and wide-based standing (p ≤ 0.016); whereas different control of PMs was observed on all surfaces (p < 0.05). Standing on the stable surface illustrated opposite control behaviors compared to balancing on both multiaxial-unstable surfaces. In summary, on stable surface, changing the feet position affected inter-segment coordination. On unstable surfaces, the postural control system appeared to maintain inter-segment coordination characteristics, while the adaptation was confined to the sensorimotor integration processes.
当前项目研究了在不同支撑表面(坚实表面(FS)、改良型和传统平衡板)上双脚并拢和双脚分开姿势平衡时的姿势运动和肌肉活动动态。我们假设运动复杂性和肌肉激活会随着平衡任务难度的增加而增加,并且在所有表面条件下都能观察到双足宽基和窄基平衡之间姿势运动的组成和控制差异。我们应用主成分分析(PCA)将26名活跃青年成年人的姿势运动轨迹分解为运动成分集(主要运动;PMs)。为每个PM计算了三个基于PCA的变量:作为运动复杂性度量的累积相对方差;作为姿势运动组成度量的相对解释方差;以及作为运动成分控制度量的PM加速度。主要结果表明,运动复杂性和肌肉活动均随着平衡任务难度的增加而增加,其中改变支撑表面比改变双脚位置产生的影响更多且更大。仅在FS上,窄基站立和宽基站立之间观察到不同的运动结构(p≤0.016);而在所有表面上均观察到PMs的不同控制(p<0.05)。与在两个多轴不稳定表面上保持平衡相比,站在稳定表面上表现出相反的控制行为。总之,在稳定表面上,改变双脚位置会影响节段间协调。在不稳定表面上,姿势控制系统似乎保持节段间协调特征,而适应性则局限于感觉运动整合过程。