Gierthmuehlen Mortimer, Plachta Dennis T T, Zentner Josef
Department of Neurosurgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitaetsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum GmbH, Bochum, Germany.
Neuroloop GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Feb 6;22(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-1019-7.
To give an overview on recent developments in permanent implant-based therapy of resistant hypertension.
The American Heart Association (AHA) recently updated their guidelines to treat high blood pressure (BP). As elevated BP now is defined as a systolic BP above 120 mmHg, the prevalence of hypertension in the USA has increased from 32% (old definition of hypertension) to 46%. In the past years, device- and implant-mediated therapies have evolved and extensively studied in various patient populations. Despite an initial drawback in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of bilateral carotid sinus stimulation (CSS), new and less invasive and unilateral systems for baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) with the BAROSTIM NEO® have been developed which show promising results in small non-randomized controlled (RCT) studies. Selective vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) has been successfully evaluated in rodents, but has not yet been tested in humans. A new endovascular approach to reshape the carotid sinus to lower BP (MobiusHD™) has been introduced (baroreflex amplification therapy) with favorable results in non-RCT trials. However, long-term results are not yet available for this treatment option. A specific subgroup of patients, those with indication for a 2-chamber cardiac pacemaker, may benefit from a new stimulation paradigm which reduces the AV latency and therefore limits the filling time of the left ventricle. The most invasive approach for resistant hypertension still is the neuromodulation by deep brain stimulation (DBS), which has been shown to significantly lower BP in single cases. Implant-mediated therapy remains a promising approach for the treatment of resistant hypertension. Due to their invasiveness, such treatment options must prove superiority over conventional therapies with regard to safety and efficacy before they can be generally offered to a wider patient population. Overall, BAROSTIM NEO® and MobiusHD™, for which large RCTs will soon be available, are likely to meet those criteria and may represent the first implant-mediated therapeutical options for hypertension, while the use of DBS probably will be reserved for individual cases. The utility of VNS awaits appropriate assessment.
概述基于永久性植入物的顽固性高血压治疗的最新进展。
美国心脏协会(AHA)最近更新了高血压治疗指南。由于现在收缩压高于120 mmHg被定义为血压升高,美国高血压的患病率已从32%(旧的高血压定义)增至46%。在过去几年中,设备和植入物介导的治疗方法不断发展,并在各类患者群体中进行了广泛研究。尽管双侧颈动脉窦刺激(CSS)的一项随机对照试验(RCT)最初存在缺陷,但已开发出新型、侵入性较小的用于压力反射激活疗法(BAT)的单侧系统,即BAROSTIM NEO®,其在小型非随机对照(RCT)研究中显示出有前景的结果。选择性迷走神经刺激(VNS)已在啮齿动物中成功评估,但尚未在人体中进行测试。一种重塑颈动脉窦以降低血压的新血管内方法(MobiusHD™)已被引入(压力反射增强疗法),在非RCT试验中取得了良好结果。然而,该治疗方案的长期结果尚不可得。特定亚组的患者,即有植入双腔心脏起搏器指征的患者,可能会从一种新的刺激模式中获益,该模式可减少房室延迟,从而限制左心室的充盈时间。对于顽固性高血压,侵入性最强的方法仍是深部脑刺激(DBS)神经调节,在个别病例中已显示出能显著降低血压。植入物介导的治疗仍然是治疗顽固性高血压的一种有前景的方法。由于其侵入性,此类治疗方案在能普遍应用于更广泛的患者群体之前,必须在安全性和有效性方面证明优于传统疗法。总体而言,很快将有大型RCT结果的BAROSTIM NEO®和MobiusHD™可能符合这些标准,可能代表首批用于高血压的植入物介导的治疗选择,而DBS的应用可能仍将局限于个别病例。VNS的效用有待适当评估。