Suppr超能文献

区域麻醉在动静脉瘘成形术中的应用。

Regional anaesthesia practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery.

机构信息

Bristol School of Anaesthesia, Bristol, UK.

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2020 May;75(5):626-633. doi: 10.1111/anae.14983. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

Abstract

We conducted a survey and semi-structured qualitative interviews to investigate current anaesthetic practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery in the UK. Responses were received from 39 out of 59 vascular centres where arteriovenous access surgery is performed, a response rate of 66%. Thirty-five centres reported routine use of brachial plexus blocks, but variation in anaesthetic skill-mix and practice were observed. Interviews were conducted with 19 clinicians from 10 NHS Trusts including anaesthetists, vascular access and renal nurses, surgeons and nephrologists. Thematic analysis identified five key findings: (1) current anaesthetic practice showed that centres could be classified as 'regional anaesthesia dominant' or 'local anaesthesia/mixed'; (2) decision making around mode of anaesthesia highlighted the key role of surgeons as frontline decision makers across both centre types; (3) perceived barriers and facilitators of regional block use included clinicians' beliefs and preferences, resource considerations and patients' treatment preferences; (4) anaesthetists' preference for supraclavicular blocks emerged, alongside acknowledgement of varied practice; (5) there was widespread support for a future randomised controlled trial, although clinician equipoise issues and logistical/resource-related concerns were viewed as potential challenges. The use of regional anaesthesia for arteriovenous fistula formation in the UK is varied and influenced by a multitude of factors. Despite the availability of anaesthetists capable of performing regional blocks, there are other limiting factors that influence the routine use of this technique. The study also highlighted the perceived need for a large multicentre, randomised controlled trial to provide an evidence base to inform current practice.

摘要

我们进行了一项调查和半结构化定性访谈,以调查英国动静脉瘘成形术的当前麻醉实践。在进行动静脉通路手术的 59 个血管中心中,有 39 个(66%)做出了回应。35 个中心报告常规使用臂丛神经阻滞,但观察到麻醉技能组合和实践存在差异。访谈对象包括来自 10 个 NHS 信托基金的 19 名临床医生,包括麻醉师、血管通路和肾脏护士、外科医生和肾病学家。主题分析确定了五个关键发现:(1)当前的麻醉实践表明,中心可以分为“区域麻醉主导”或“局部麻醉/混合”;(2)麻醉方式的决策突显了外科医生作为两种中心类型的一线决策者的关键作用;(3)区域阻滞使用的感知障碍和促进因素包括临床医生的信念和偏好、资源考虑因素以及患者的治疗偏好;(4)出现了对锁骨上阻滞的麻醉师偏好,同时也承认了不同的实践;(5)尽管存在临床医生平衡问题和后勤/资源相关问题被视为潜在挑战,但广泛支持未来的随机对照试验。英国动静脉瘘成形术使用区域麻醉的方式多种多样,受到多种因素的影响。尽管有能够进行区域阻滞的麻醉师,但还有其他限制因素影响该技术的常规使用。该研究还强调了认为需要进行大型多中心、随机对照试验以提供证据基础来为当前实践提供信息的必要性。

相似文献

6
Anaesthesia for assisted conception: a survey of UK practice.辅助生殖的麻醉:英国实践调查
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Apr;16(4):225-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00461.x.
7
A simple guide to regional anaesthesia.区域麻醉简易指南。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018 Apr 2;79(4):211-217. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.4.211.
8
Regional anesthesia for vascular surgery.
Anesthesiol Clin. 2014 Sep;32(3):639-59. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base.混合方法研究:扩大证据基础。
Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jul;20(3):74-75. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102699. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验