"Super-Utilizer" Interventions: What They Reveal About Evaluation Research, Wishful Thinking, and Health Equity.
作者信息
Lantz Paula M
出版信息
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):31-34. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12449. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
"Super-Utilizer" Interventions: What They Reveal About Evaluation Research, Wishful Thinking, and Health Equity.“超级使用者”干预措施：它们揭示了关于评估研究、一厢情愿的想法和健康公平性的哪些内容。
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):31-34. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12449. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
2
Interventions to Decrease Use in Prehospital and Emergency Care Settings Among Super-Utilizers in the United States: A Systematic Review.减少美国超高利用率患者在院前和急诊环境中使用的干预措施：系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Apr;77(2):99-111. doi: 10.1177/1077558719845722. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Is a strategy focused on super-utilizers equal to the task of health care system transformation? Yes.专注于超级使用者的策略等同于医疗保健系统转型的任务吗？答案是肯定的。
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;13(1):6-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1746.
4
If the face is familiar, the patient may be overusing healthcare.如果该患者面容熟悉，可能存在过度使用医疗服务的情况。
Hosp Case Manag. 2014 Jan;22(1):1-4.
5
Should Hospital Emergency Departments Be Used as Revenue Streams Despite Needs to Curb Overutilization?尽管需要遏制过度使用，但医院急诊科是否应被用作收入来源？
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Mar 1;21(3):E207-214. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.207.
6
The CARE 2 Committee: improving efficient use of the ED through a review of high-use patients.CARE 2委员会：通过审查高就诊量患者来提高急诊科的使用效率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):465-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.016. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
7
High users of healthcare: Strategies to improve care, reduce costs.高医疗保健使用者：改善护理、降低成本的策略。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2018 Jan;85(1):25-31. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.85a.16082.
8
Organization of pediatric emergencies.儿科急诊的组织
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Nov;29(11):1243-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182aa5019.
9
ED interventions.急诊干预措施。
Trustee. 2012 Oct;65(9):10-4, 2.
10
The busy emergency department.繁忙的急诊科。
Am J Med Qual. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):170-1. doi: 10.1177/1062860610364575.
引用本文的文献
1
Hotspotters Project: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster RCT on the cost-effectiveness of 12-month proactive, integrated and personalised care for patients with problems on multiple life domains and high acute care use.热点人群项目：一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验的研究方案，该试验旨在探究针对多个生活领域存在问题且急性护理使用率高的患者，提供为期12个月的主动、综合和个性化护理的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e087940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087940.
2
Perceptions of Medically Complex Patients Enrolled in an Ambulatory Intensive Care Unit at a Healthcare-for-the-Homeless Clinic.对一家无家可归者医疗诊所的门诊重症监护病房收治的医疗复杂患者的认知。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2025 Feb 20;37(5):888-899. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230403R1.
3
Can propensity score matching replace randomized controlled trials?倾向得分匹配能否取代随机对照试验？
World J Methodol. 2024 Mar 20;14(1):90590. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i1.90590.
4
Multisector Collaboration vs. Social Democracy for Addressing Social Determinants of Health.多部门协作与社会民主在解决健康社会决定因素方面的比较
Milbank Q. 2024 Jun;102(2):280-301. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12685. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
5
The Camden Coalition Care Management Program Improved Intermediate Care Coordination: A Randomized Controlled Trial.卡姆登联盟关怀管理计划改善了中级医疗协调：一项随机对照试验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jan;43(1):131-139. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01151. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
6
A qualitative system model to describe the causes and drivers of frequent potentially avoidable presentations to the emergency department.一个用于描述频繁前往急诊科进行潜在可避免就诊的原因和驱动因素的定性系统模型。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 4;9(11):e21304. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21304. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Ambulatory Intensive Care for Medically Complex Patients at a Health Care Clinic for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: The SUMMIT Randomized Clinical Trial.在一家为无家可归者提供医疗服务的诊所，为患有多种疾病的患者提供门诊强化护理：SUMMIT 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342012. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42012.
8
Development and validation of a tool to predict high-need, high-cost patients hospitalised with ischaemic heart disease.开发并验证一种工具，以预测因缺血性心脏病住院的高需求、高费用患者。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 26;13(9):e073485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073485.
9
Association between service scope of primary care facilities and prevalence of high-cost population: a retrospective study in rural Guizhou, China.基层医疗服务机构服务范围与高费用人群患病率的关联：中国贵州农村的回顾性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 25;23(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01914-5.
10
Research translation: A pathway for health inequity.研究转化：健康不平等的途径。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb;16(2):179-183. doi: 10.1111/cts.13443. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
本文引用的文献
1
Health Care Hotspotting - A Randomized, Controlled Trial.医疗保健热点研究——一项随机对照试验
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1906848.
2
Meanings and Misunderstandings: A Social Determinants of Health Lexicon for Health Care Systems.意义与误解：医疗保健系统的健康决定因素词汇
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):407-419. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12390. Epub 2019 May 8.
3
Interventions to Decrease Use in Prehospital and Emergency Care Settings Among Super-Utilizers in the United States: A Systematic Review.减少美国超高利用率患者在院前和急诊环境中使用的干预措施：系统评价。
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Apr;77(2):99-111. doi: 10.1177/1077558719845722. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
The Medicalization of Population Health: Who Will Stay Upstream?人群健康的医学化：谁将站在上游？
Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):36-39. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12363. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
For many patients who use large amounts of health care services, the need is intense yet temporary.对于许多使用大量医疗服务的患者来说，这种需求是强烈的，但却是暂时的。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Aug;34(8):1312-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1186.
Zotero 插件