Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Microsurgery. 2020 May;40(4):501-511. doi: 10.1002/micr.30564. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
Early detection of vascular compromise following free flap microsurgical reconstruction is essential. This can lead to timely reoperations and flap salvage. Both arteries and veins are monitored postoperatively with implantable ultrasound Dopplers based on surgeon preference with no consensus as to which method is best. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared arterial to venous implantable Dopplers for postoperative monitoring of microsurgical free flap reconstruction.
Five databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) were systematically and independently searched. PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines were strictly followed. Clinical characteristics, donor and recipient sites, specific arterial or venous vessels, diagnostic data, outcomes, and complications were recorded.
The seven studies included in the meta-analysis were published from 1994 to 2018, with results from 38 of the possible 64 outcomes and complications queried. A total of 763 flaps with implantable Doppler probes on 527 arteries and 388 veins were included in the study. Compared to patients monitored with venous implantable Dopplers, arterial monitoring was associated with a risk of false-positives reduced by 74% (RR:0.26, 95% CI:0.12, 0.55, I = 40%, p = .0004) and risk of signal loss reduced by 63% (RR:0.37, 95% CI:0.24, 0.59, I = 26%, p < .0001). Patients being monitored with a venous implantable Doppler did not show significantly different sensitivities, specificities, true-positives, false-negatives, true-negatives, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, time to signal loss, take-backs, salvage rates, flap failures, flap failure rates, arterial, venous, vascular, and hematoma compromise compared to an arterial implantable Doppler.
These findings suggest arteries may be the best vessels to monitor when using an implantable Doppler following free flap microsurgical reconstruction. Caution is advised when interpreting these findings for clinical significance due to no significant differences in take-backs, SR, flap failures, and FFR.
游离皮瓣显微重建后早期发现血管功能障碍至关重要。这可以导致及时的再次手术和皮瓣挽救。根据外科医生的偏好,术后使用植入式超声多普勒监测动脉和静脉,但哪种方法最好尚无共识。本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了动脉与静脉植入式多普勒在游离皮瓣显微重建术后监测中的作用。
系统地独立检索了 5 个数据库(PubMed 中的 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Scopus)。严格遵循 PRISMA 和 Cochrane 指南。记录临床特征、供区和受区部位、特定的动脉或静脉血管、诊断数据、结果和并发症。
纳入荟萃分析的 7 项研究发表于 1994 年至 2018 年,对 64 个可能的结果和并发症中的 38 个进行了查询。共纳入 763 例皮瓣,527 条动脉和 388 条静脉植入多普勒探头。与接受静脉植入式多普勒监测的患者相比,动脉监测的假阳性风险降低 74%(RR:0.26,95%CI:0.12,0.55,I = 40%,p = 0.0004),信号丢失风险降低 63%(RR:0.37,95%CI:0.24,0.59,I = 26%,p<0.0001)。接受静脉植入式多普勒监测的患者与接受动脉植入式多普勒监测的患者相比,敏感性、特异性、真阳性、假阴性、真阴性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、信号丢失时间、回取、挽救率、皮瓣失败、皮瓣失败率、动脉、静脉、血管和血肿功能障碍无显著差异。
这些发现表明,游离皮瓣显微重建后使用植入式多普勒监测时,动脉可能是监测的最佳血管。由于回取、SR、皮瓣失败和 FFR 无显著差异,因此在解释这些发现的临床意义时应谨慎。