Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jan-Feb;68:101532. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101532. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
The nexus between law enforcement and public health represents a new and emerging policy field. Yet, most scholarly work has been devoted to police attitudes and interventions involving people affected by mental illness. This paper draws attention to a law enforcement - public health partnership in Amsterdam, the capital city of the Netherlands. We present a qualitative study based on interviews and some observations. Three major themes emerged from our fieldwork that involved policy makers, community police officers, and district nurses: how these officers and nurses perceive the problem of disorderly and confused people, how they work together in practice, and how they relate to a wider network of many other players. We argue that community police officers and district nurses have developed a kind of informal 'team play' consisting of three steps: receiving and analysing a signal, undertaking action, and providing aftercare. These steps offer a preventative approach aimed at avoiding and forestalling crisis situations. Difficulties arise in terms of tracing so-called 'care avoiders' (people who do not present a 'readiness for treatment'), hampered information exchange, and the governance of partners beyond our respondents' own organisations. In particular, we argue that today's society is not only governed through crime, but also through care. There is no such thing as a robust 'punitive complex' in which policing and criminal justice logics prevail. Rather, we witness a multi-agency network of police, public health, mental health, youth care housing associations and other nodal actors, each with their own bureaucratic logics and working methods tending to clash with, or even undermine, informal team play on the streets.
执法与公共卫生之间的关系代表了一个新的、正在出现的政策领域。然而,大多数学术研究都集中在警察对受精神疾病影响的人群的态度和干预上。本文关注了荷兰首都阿姆斯特丹的一个执法与公共卫生伙伴关系。我们基于访谈和一些观察提出了一项定性研究。我们的实地工作涉及政策制定者、社区警察和地区护士,从中得出了三个主要主题:这些警察和护士如何看待混乱和困惑人群的问题,他们如何在实践中合作,以及他们如何与更广泛的许多其他参与者网络相关联。我们认为,社区警察和地区护士已经发展出一种非正式的“团队合作”,包括三个步骤:接收和分析信号、采取行动和提供后续护理。这些步骤提供了一种预防方法,旨在避免和预防危机情况。在追踪所谓的“回避护理者”(不准备接受治疗的人)方面存在困难,信息交流受阻,以及受访者自己组织之外的合作伙伴的治理也存在问题。特别是,我们认为当今社会不仅通过犯罪来治理,也通过护理来治理。没有一个强大的“惩罚综合体”,其中存在警务和刑事司法逻辑占主导地位。相反,我们见证了一个由警察、公共卫生、心理健康、青年关怀住房协会和其他节点行为者组成的多机构网络,每个机构都有自己的官僚逻辑和工作方法,这些方法往往会与街头的非正式团队合作相冲突,甚至破坏这种合作。