Effects of variable versus nonvariable controlled mechanical ventilation on pulmonary inflammation in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome in pigs.

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation with variable tidal volumes (V) may improve lung function and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, previous investigations were limited to less than 6 h, and control groups did not follow clinical standards. We hypothesised that 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable V reduces pulmonary inflammation (as reflected by neutrophil infiltration), compared with standard protective, nonvariable ventilation.

METHODS

Experimental ARDS was induced in 14 anaesthetised pigs with saline lung lavage followed by injurious mechanical ventilation. Pigs (n=7 per group) were randomly assigned to using variable V or nonvariable V modes of mechanical ventilation for 24 h. In both groups, ventilator settings including positive end-expiratory pressure and oxygen inspiratory fraction were adjusted according to the ARDS Network protocol. Pulmonary inflammation (primary endpoint) and perfusion were assessed by positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[F]fluoro-d-glucose and Gallium (Ga)-labelled microspheres, respectively. Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and haemodynamics were quantified. Lung aeration was determined using CT.

RESULTS

The specific global uptake rate of F-FDG increased to a similar extent regardless of mode of mechanical ventilation (median uptake for variable V=0.016 min [inter-quartile range, 0.012-0.029] compared with median uptake for nonvariable V=0.037 min [0.008-0.053]; P=0.406). Gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, haemodynamics, and lung aeration and perfusion were similar in both variable and nonvariable V ventilatory modes.

CONCLUSION

In a porcine model of ARDS, 24 h of mechanical ventilation with variable V did not attenuate pulmonary inflammation compared with standard protective mechanical ventilation with nonvariable V.