Revision surgery after vascularized or non-vascularized scaphoid nonunion repair: A national population study.

HYPOTHESIS

We aimed (1) to discover the prevalence of vascularized bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion and (2) to compare healing using vascularized bone grafting versus standard non-vascularized techniques. Secondarily, we sought to compare resource utilization between procedures and identify factors that may be associated with nonunion repair failure. We hypothesized that, despite being less common, vascularized bone grafts have greater success than non-vascularized bone grafting surgeries.

METHODS

We performed a large population analysis using the Truven MarketScan databases to identify patients from 2009 to 2017 with a diagnosis of a scaphoid nonunion undergoing repair surgery with and without the insertion of a pedicled or free vascularized bone graft. We defined any subsequent scaphoid or wrist surgery within 12 months after surgery as surgery failure. We compared success rates and post-operative resource utilization using Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

Of 4177 eligible patients, 358 underwent nonunion repair with vascularized bone graft and 3819 patients received non-vascularized bone grafting. The failure rate requiring revision surgery was 5.0% in vascularized repair, versus 6.1% for non-vascularized surgery. Age and comorbidities did not affect bone graft type. Areas with higher median household incomes had more vascularized repairs. Vascularized bone graft patients received significantly more therapy and imaging after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Most scaphoid nonunion repairs are performed without vascularize bone grafting. Typical nonunions may not justify the increased time and technical demands of vascularized bone grafting, and traditional repair should remain first line treatment for scaphoid nonunions without additional risk factors. Further studies to elucidate which fractures benefit most from vascularized grafting are needed.