Barrenengoa-Cuadra María Jesús, Angón-Puras Luis Ángel, Moscosio-Cuevas José Ignacio, González-Lama Jesús, Fernández-Luco Marian, Gracia-Ballarín Rafael
Centro de Salud Sáenz de Buruaga (Osakidetza), Bilbao, Vizcaya, España; Grupo de Trabajo de Fibromialgia, Migraña y Dolor crónico de Osatzen, Sociedad Vasca de MFyC, Bilbao, Vizcaya, España.
Grupo de Trabajo de Fibromialgia, Migraña y Dolor crónico de Osatzen, Sociedad Vasca de MFyC, Bilbao, Vizcaya, España; Centro de salud Las Arenas (Osakidetza), Getxo, Vizcaya, España.
Aten Primaria. 2021 Jan;53(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.10.007. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a group intervention in Primary Care in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) based on pain neuroscience education (PNE).
Pre-post study.
Urban Primary Health Centre in Bilbao.
Patients with FM (2010 American College of Rheumatology Diagnostic Criteria for fibromyalgia), ≥18 years.
5 weekly sessions (2hours each), and a reminder session one month later.
Compliance with FM criteria, assessed using the WPI (Widespread Pain Index, number of pain areas) and the SS (severity of symptoms) questionnaires. An assessment was also made on the impact of FM on functional capacity (FIQ:≥20% and ≥50% reduction in the FIQ total score from baseline to after treatment, and proportion of patients with FIQ<39 at the end of the study). Assessments were made at baseline, one month following the 5th session, and during the 6- and 12-month follow-up.
All the study evaluations were completed by 85/98 patients. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the 3 studied categories (WPI, SS, and FIQ) since the first visit, and was maintained until the final visit (12 months later). A total of 45 patients (53%, 95% CI: 42%-63%), more than those at baseline, scored FIQ<39 (no worse than mild functional impairment). One month following the 5th session there were 44 patients (52%, 95% CI: 41%-62%) that no longer met FM criteria and, at the end of follow-up, there were 56 patients (66%, 95% CI: 55%-75%).
An intervention based on PNE has shown to be feasible in Primary Care, with results in the upper range of those published with other treatments for FM.
评估基于疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)的基层医疗中针对纤维肌痛(FM)患者的团体干预效果。
前后对照研究。
毕尔巴鄂的城市初级卫生中心。
符合FM标准(2010年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛诊断标准)、年龄≥18岁的FM患者。
每周进行5次 sessions(每次2小时),并在1个月后进行一次提醒session。
使用WPI(广泛性疼痛指数,疼痛区域数量)和SS(症状严重程度)问卷评估对FM标准的依从性。还对FM对功能能力的影响进行了评估(FIQ:从基线到治疗后FIQ总分降低≥20%和≥50%,以及研究结束时FIQ<39的患者比例)。在基线、第5次session后1个月、6个月和12个月随访时进行评估。
98例患者中有85例完成了所有研究评估。自首次就诊以来,在3个研究类别(WPI、SS和FIQ)中观察到有统计学意义的改善,并持续到最后一次就诊(12个月后)。共有45例患者(53%,95%CI:42%-63%),比基线时更多,FIQ<39(不超过轻度功能损害)。第5次session后1个月,有44例患者(52%,95%CI:41%-62%)不再符合FM标准,随访结束时,有56例患者(66%,95%CI:55%-75%)。
基于PNE的干预在基层医疗中已证明是可行的,其结果在已发表的FM其他治疗方法的范围内处于较高水平。