• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么医生会在脑出血后开具预防性抗癫痫药物:适应性联合分析。

Why Physicians Prescribe Prophylactic Seizure Medications after Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.

机构信息

Marquette University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;29(4):104628. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104628. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104628
PMID:32033905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7099929/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seizures are a morbid complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and increase the risk for herniation, status epilepticus, and worse patient outcomes. Prophylactic levetiracetam is administered to approximately 40% of patients with ICH. It is unclear which patients are consciously selected for treatment by physicians. We sought to determine how patients are selected for treatment with prophylactic levetiracetam after ICH.

METHODS

We administered an adaptive conjoint analysis using decision making software to an NIH Stroke Trials Network Working Group. The adaptive conjoint analysis determines the most influential attributes for making a decision in an iterative, algorithm-driven process. We asked respondents which would most influence a decision to administer prophylactic levetiracetam. The attributes and their levels were taken from published phenotypes associated with prophylactic seizure medications and the likelihood of seizures after ICH: hematoma location (lobar or basal ganglia), hematoma volume (<=10 mL or >10 mL), level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale 5-12 or Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15), age (<65 or ≥65 years), and race (White or Caucasian or Black/African American). The algorithm terminated when the attributes were ranked from most to least influential.

RESULTS

The study sample included 27 respondents who completed the adaptive conjoint analysis out of 42 who responded to the survey with a mean age of 43.4 ± 9.4 years. The attribute with the greatest weight was hematoma location (30%), followed by reduced level of consciousness (24%), hematoma volume (19%), race (14%), and age (13%). Ranks of attributes were different (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to administer prophylactic levetiracetam to patients with ICH is driven by lobar hematoma location and depressed level of consciousness. Future research on prophylactic seizure medication could focus on patients most likely to receive it.

摘要

背景

癫痫发作是脑出血(ICH)的一种严重并发症,增加了脑疝、癫痫持续状态和更差的患者预后的风险。约 40%的脑出血患者预防性给予左乙拉西坦。目前尚不清楚哪些患者是医生有意识地选择进行治疗的。我们试图确定ICH 后患者是如何被选择预防性给予左乙拉西坦治疗的。

方法

我们使用决策软件对 NIH 卒中试验网络工作组进行了适应性联合分析。适应性联合分析通过迭代、算法驱动的过程确定决策的最具影响力的属性。我们询问受访者哪些因素最能影响给予预防性左乙拉西坦的决定。属性及其水平取自与预防性抗癫痫药物和脑出血后癫痫发作的可能性相关的已发表表型:血肿位置(脑叶或基底节)、血肿体积(<=10 mL 或 >10 mL)、意识水平(格拉斯哥昏迷量表 5-12 或格拉斯哥昏迷量表 13-15)、年龄(<65 或>=65 岁)和种族(白种人或高加索人或黑种人/非裔美国人)。当属性从最具影响力到最不具影响力进行排名时,算法终止。

结果

研究样本包括 27 名完成适应性联合分析的受访者,其中 42 名受访者对调查做出了回应,平均年龄为 43.4±9.4 岁。权重最大的属性是血肿位置(30%),其次是意识水平降低(24%)、血肿体积(19%)、种族(14%)和年龄(13%)。属性的排名不同(P<.001)。

结论

ICH 患者给予预防性左乙拉西坦的决定取决于脑叶血肿位置和意识水平降低。预防性抗癫痫药物的未来研究可以集中在最有可能接受该药物的患者身上。

相似文献

1
Why Physicians Prescribe Prophylactic Seizure Medications after Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.为什么医生会在脑出血后开具预防性抗癫痫药物:适应性联合分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Apr;29(4):104628. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104628. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
Prophylactic Seizure Medication and Health-Related Quality of Life After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.预防性抗癫痫药物与脑出血后健康相关生活质量
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1480-1485. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003272.
3
Survey of prophylactic antiseizure drug use for non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage.非创伤性脑出血预防性抗癫痫药物使用情况调查
Neurol Res. 2013 Nov;35(9):984-7. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000197. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
4
Prophylactic Anticonvulsants in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.脑出血的预防性抗惊厥药。
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Oct;27(2):220-228. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0385-8.
5
Evolving use of seizure medications after intracerebral hemorrhage: A multicenter study.脑出血后癫痫药物的使用演变:一项多中心研究。
Neurology. 2017 Jan 3;88(1):52-56. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003461. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Effect of Newer Generation Anticonvulsant Prophylaxis on Seizure Incidence After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.新型抗癫痫药物预防自发性脑出血后癫痫发作的效果。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e461-e465. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.197. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Seizures after spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.自发性幕上脑出血后的癫痫发作
Epilepsia. 2002 Oct;43(10):1175-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.00302.x.
8
Safety and efficacy of prophylactic levetiracetam for prevention of epileptic seizures in the acute phase of intracerebral haemorrhage (PEACH): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.预防性左乙拉西坦预防脑出血急性期癫痫发作的安全性和有效性(PEACH):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Sep;21(9):781-791. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00235-6.
9
Disparities in the Use of Seizure Medications After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.脑出血后癫痫药物使用的差异
Stroke. 2017 Mar;48(3):802-804. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015779. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
Prophylactic Antiepileptic Drug Use and Outcome in the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study.脑出血种族/民族差异研究中预防性抗癫痫药物的使用与结局
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3532-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010875. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Seizure Prophylaxis in Patients Hospitalized with Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.非创伤性脑出血住院患者癫痫预防指南:神经重症监护学会给医护人员的临床实践指南
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02183-z. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
2
Epidemiological Modeling of the Impact of Public Health Policies on Hepatitis C: Protocol for a Gamification Tool Targeting Microelimination.公共卫生政策对丙型肝炎影响的流行病学建模:针对微消除的游戏化工具方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 25;12:e38521. doi: 10.2196/38521.
3
Predictors of unprovoked seizures in intracerebral hemorrhages.脑出血后无诱因发作的预测因素。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Dec;123(6):2195-2200. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02226-w. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
4
One Size Does Not Fit All: Risk Stratification in Seizure Prophylaxis.一刀切并不适用于所有情况:癫痫预防中的风险分层
Epilepsy Curr. 2021 Dec 1;22(1):51-53. doi: 10.1177/15357597211056120. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
5
Let's End HepC: Modelling Public Health Epidemiological Policies Applied to Hepatitis C in Spain.让我们终结丙型肝炎:在西班牙实施公共卫生流行病学政策模型以应对丙型肝炎。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 7;9:735572. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.735572. eCollection 2021.
6
Long-term continuation of anti-seizure medications after acute stroke.急性脑卒中后抗癫痫药物的长期持续应用。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Sep;8(9):1857-1866. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51440. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
7
Seizure Prophylaxis After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.自发性脑出血后癫痫预防。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1128-1136. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2249.
8
Post-acute symptomatic seizure (PASS) clinic: A continuity of care model for patients impacted by continuous EEG monitoring.急性症状性癫痫发作(PASS)门诊:针对受持续脑电图监测影响的患者的连续性护理模式。
Epilepsia Open. 2020 Apr 14;5(2):255-262. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12393. eCollection 2020 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Decision-Making for Thrombolysis of Acute Minor Stroke Using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.使用适应性联合分析进行急性轻度中风溶栓治疗的临床决策
Neurohospitalist. 2019 Jan;9(1):9-14. doi: 10.1177/1941874418799563. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
Prophylactic Seizure Medication and Health-Related Quality of Life After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.预防性抗癫痫药物与脑出血后健康相关生活质量
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1480-1485. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003272.
3
Association of an Electroencephalography-Based Risk Score With Seizure Probability in Hospitalized Patients.基于脑电图的风险评分与住院患者癫痫发作概率的关联
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1419-1424. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2459.
4
Disparities in the Use of Seizure Medications After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.脑出血后癫痫药物使用的差异
Stroke. 2017 Mar;48(3):802-804. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015779. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Evolving use of seizure medications after intracerebral hemorrhage: A multicenter study.脑出血后癫痫药物的使用演变:一项多中心研究。
Neurology. 2017 Jan 3;88(1):52-56. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003461. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Agitation, Delirium, and Cognitive Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.脑出血中的躁动、谵妄及认知结局
Psychosomatics. 2017 Jan-Feb;58(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
Prophylactic Antiepileptic Drug Use and Outcome in the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Study.脑出血种族/民族差异研究中预防性抗癫痫药物的使用与结局
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3532-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010875. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
8
Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.自发性脑出血管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000069. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
The CAVE score for predicting late seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血后迟发性癫痫预测的 CAVE 评分。
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):1971-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004686. Epub 2014 May 29.
10
Anticonvulsant use and outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage.抗癫痫药物的使用与脑出血后的转归。
Stroke. 2009 Dec;40(12):3810-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.559948. Epub 2009 Sep 24.