State Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;177(12):2860-2871. doi: 10.1111/bph.15015. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Immunotherapeutic intervention is one of the most promising strategies for the prevention and treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although they showed great success in AD mouse models, the clinical trials of many immune approaches failed due to low efficacy and safety. Thus, an animal model which can show the potential side effects of vaccines or antibodies is urgently needed. In this study, we generated EAE/AD mice by crossing APP/PS1 mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mice. We then investigated the efficacy and safety of two vaccines: the immunogens of which were Aβ1-42 aggregates (Aβ42 vaccine) and an oligomer-specific conformational epitope (AOE1 vaccine), respectively.
EAE/AD mice were immunized with the Aβ42 vaccine or AOE1 vaccine five times at biweekly intervals. After the final immunization, cognitive function was evaluated by the Morris water maze, Y maze, and object recognition tests. Neuropathological changes in the mouse brains were analysed by immunohistochemistry and ELISA.
In contrast to previous findings in conventional AD animal models, Aβ42 immunization promoted neuroinflammation, enhanced Aβ levels and plaque burden, and failed to restore cognitive deficits in EAE/AD mice. By contrast, AOE1 immunization dramatically attenuated neuroinflammation, reduced Aβ levels, and improved cognitive performance in EAE/AD mice.
These results suggest that the EAE/AD mouse model can exhibit the potential side effects of AD immune approaches that conventional AD animal models fail to display. Furthermore, strategies specifically targeting Aβ oligomers may be safe and show clinical benefit for AD treatment.
免疫治疗干预是预防和治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)最有前途的策略之一。尽管它们在 AD 小鼠模型中显示出了巨大的成功,但由于疗效和安全性低,许多免疫方法的临床试验都失败了。因此,迫切需要一种能够显示疫苗或抗体潜在副作用的动物模型。在这项研究中,我们通过将 APP/PS1 小鼠与实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎(EAE)小鼠杂交,产生了 EAE/AD 小鼠。然后,我们研究了两种疫苗的疗效和安全性:它们的免疫原分别是 Aβ1-42 聚集物(Aβ42 疫苗)和一个寡聚体特异性构象表位(AOE1 疫苗)。
EAE/AD 小鼠每隔两周接受 5 次 Aβ42 疫苗或 AOE1 疫苗免疫。最后一次免疫后,通过 Morris 水迷宫、Y 迷宫和物体识别测试评估认知功能。通过免疫组织化学和 ELISA 分析小鼠大脑中的神经病理学变化。
与传统 AD 动物模型中的先前发现相反,Aβ42 免疫促进了神经炎症,增加了 Aβ 水平和斑块负担,并且未能恢复 EAE/AD 小鼠的认知缺陷。相比之下,AOE1 免疫显著减弱了神经炎症,降低了 Aβ 水平,并改善了 EAE/AD 小鼠的认知表现。
这些结果表明,EAE/AD 小鼠模型可以表现出传统 AD 动物模型未能显示的 AD 免疫方法的潜在副作用。此外,专门针对 Aβ 寡聚体的策略可能是安全的,并为 AD 治疗带来临床益处。