Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Jul;64(6):751-758. doi: 10.1111/aas.13558. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
Airway management is a defining skill for anaesthesiologists. Anaesthesiologists must maintain and update these crucial skills throughout their career, but how this is best achieved remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify anaesthesiologists' procedural volume, confidence in airway management and their current and preferred future educational strategies.
A questionnaire was developed consisting of 28 items exploring essential skills in airway management. All anaesthesiologists in the Capital Region of Denmark were invited to participate.
The response rate was 84% (240/285). Most anaesthesiologists felt competent to a high or very high degree in basic airway management. Anaesthesiologists from anaesthesia felt confident to a significantly higher degree than those working in the intensive care unit (ICU) regarding the practical aspects of airway management in both the anticipated difficult airway (93% vs 73%, P < .001) and the unanticipated difficult airway (81% vs 61%, P = .002). Both groups performed most of the key advanced techniques ≤4 times yearly, whereas anaesthesiologists from the ICU had a lower and less diverse procedural volume than those working in anaesthesia. The anaesthesiologists preferred training through their daily clinical work, hands-on workshops, and scenario-based simulation training. However, a large discrepancy was identified between the current and the desired level of training.
The anaesthesiologists felt competent to a high or very high degree in basic airway management but the current procedural volume in advanced airway management causes concern for skill maintenance. Furthermore, we found a gap between the current and the desired level of supplemental training.
气道管理是麻醉师的一项重要技能。麻醉师必须在整个职业生涯中保持和更新这些关键技能,但如何最好地实现这一目标仍不清楚。本研究旨在阐明麻醉师的程序量、气道管理的信心以及他们目前和未来首选的教育策略。
开发了一份包含 28 个项目的问卷,旨在探索气道管理中的基本技能。丹麦首都地区的所有麻醉师都被邀请参加。
回复率为 84%(240/285)。大多数麻醉师在基本气道管理方面感到非常有信心或非常有信心。麻醉科医生在预期困难气道(93%对 73%,P<.001)和意外困难气道(81%对 61%,P=.002)的气道管理实际方面比 ICU 医生更有信心。两组都进行了大部分关键的高级技术,每年≤4 次,而 ICU 的麻醉师的程序量比麻醉科医生的程序量低,而且种类也少。麻醉师更喜欢通过日常临床工作、实践工作坊和基于情景的模拟训练来接受培训。然而,当前的培训水平与所需的培训水平之间存在很大差距。
麻醉师在基本气道管理方面感到非常有信心或非常有信心,但目前高级气道管理的程序量令人担忧。此外,我们发现当前和所需的补充培训之间存在差距。