Department of Surgery, Hepato-Biliary Centre in Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Villejuif 94800, France; INSERM, Unit 1193, Villejuif 94800, France; Inria, centre de recherche de Paris, 2 rue Simone Iff, Paris 75012, France.
Inria, centre de recherche de Paris, 2 rue Simone Iff, Paris 75012, France.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Mar;73:195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
Resection And Partial Liver Segment 2/3 Transplantation with Delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID) includes total hepatectomy in 2 steps with small graft transplantation at first stage. To avoid graft portal hyperperfusion, portal vein pressure monitoring is required after revascularization and right portal vein clamping. To date, portal flow modulation has not been reported but simulating hemodynamics in RAPID patients would be useful to anticipate these procedures. Our team developed hemodynamic 0D modeling; we aimed to assess if this mathematical model could be accurately used in the RAPID setting.
The modified 0D model was retrospectively tested on 3 patients. We compared our estimated portal vein pressures and portocaval gradients to those intraoperatively measured, as indication to modulate portal flow relies on these measures.
Portal pressures measured after right portal vein clamping (end of RAPID procedure) in patients 1, 2 and 3 were respectively of 14, 16 and 12 mmHg while the simulated pressures were of 13.1, 14.8 and 11.5 mmHg (p = 0.25). Portocaval gradients measured after right portal vein clamping in the 3 patients were respectively of 10, 11 and 7 mmHg while the simulated gradients were of 9.9, 11.6 and 8.3 mmHg (p = 0.5).
We succeeded to predict portal vein pressures and portocaval gradients after RAPID. This promising report demonstrates that 0D simulation could be a useful tool for human decision-making. Moreover, such a patient-specific model could be of importance if we transpose RAPID experience to hepatocellular carcinoma bearing cirrhotics, a population with high probability of portal hypertension after RAPID.
肝切除联合部分肝段 2/3 移植序贯全肝切除(RAPID)包括两步全肝切除,第一阶段进行小移植物移植。为避免移植肝门静脉高压,再灌注后需监测门静脉压力并夹闭右门静脉。迄今为止,尚未报道门静脉血流调节,但模拟 RAPID 患者的血流动力学有助于预测这些操作。我们的团队开发了血流动力学 0D 模型;我们旨在评估该数学模型是否可以准确用于 RAPID 环境。
对 3 名患者进行了回顾性测试。我们将门静脉压力和门腔静脉梯度的估计值与术中测量值进行了比较,因为调节门静脉血流的指征依赖于这些测量值。
在 RAPID 手术结束时(RAPID 手术结束时)测量的 3 名患者的右门静脉夹闭后的门静脉压力分别为 14、16 和 12mmHg,而模拟压力分别为 13.1、14.8 和 11.5mmHg(p=0.25)。3 名患者右门静脉夹闭后测量的门腔静脉梯度分别为 10、11 和 7mmHg,而模拟梯度分别为 9.9、11.6 和 8.3mmHg(p=0.5)。
我们成功地预测了 RAPID 后门静脉压力和门腔静脉梯度。这一有希望的报告表明,0D 模拟可能是人类决策的有用工具。此外,如果我们将 RAPID 经验应用于肝癌伴肝硬化患者,这种患者特异性模型可能非常重要,因为这些患者在 RAPID 后发生门静脉高压的可能性很高。