Medial stabilizing technique preserves anatomical joint line and increases range of motion compared with the gap-balancing technique in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND

Medial compartment stability is important in total knee arthroplasty. The medial stabilizing technique (MST) has been proposed to achieve medial stability without excessive medial soft tissue release in total knee arthroplasty. Herein, we compare the MST and the gap-balancing technique (GBT) in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients with varus knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using the navigation system. They were divided into MST (n = 39) and GBT (n = 31) groups. We assessed intraoperative navigation data, radiographic data, and insert thickness. Preoperative and postoperative joint line changes were measured. We also assessed range of motion and clinical instability before and after total knee arthroplasty. These parameters were statistically compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the GBT group, medial extension gaps were significantly smaller in the MST group (P = 0.008). The gap difference between medial and lateral extension was significantly greater in the MST group (P = 0.018). Other navigation data showed no significant differences. Insert thickness and joint line changes were significantly lower in the MST group (P = 0.001, P = 0.018, respectively). Postoperative range of motion was significantly greater in the MST group (P = 0.032). There was no objective or subjective knee instability in either group.

CONCLUSION

The MST could avoid knee joint line changes and might increase postoperative range of motion. Although the MST permitted a discrepancy between medial and lateral gaps, no patients felt knee instability. The MST might improve the results of total knee arthroplasty.