University of Ottawa, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
University of Ottawa, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
J Sex Med. 2020 Apr;17(4):702-715. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
The vaginal photoplethysmograph (VPP) is a reusable intravaginal device often employed in sexual psychophysiology studies to assess changes in vaginal blood flow, an indicator of sexual arousal.
To test whether placing a disposable cover on the VPP probe impacts the acquired data. A condom cover would reduce risk of disease transmission and likely increase participant comfort but may negatively impact the VPP signal.
The genital responses of 25 cisgender women (mean age = 21.3 years, standard deviation = 2.6) were assessed with VPP in a within-subjects design with 2 conditions-with and without a polyisoprene condom cover. Sexual responses were elicited by audiovisual film clips that varied in erotic intensity: nonsexual (nonsexual male-female interaction), low-intensity sexual (nude exercise), and high-intensity sexual (male-female intercourse). Women continuously rated their sexual arousal during stimulus presentations.
Change in vaginal pulse amplitude and also self-reported sexual arousal.
The magnitude of sexual response to each stimulus category and the overall pattern of results were found to be highly similar in the cover-off and cover-on conditions. The high-intensity sexual stimulus category elicited a greater sexual response than all other categories. The low-intensity sexual category elicited a (small) genital response in only the cover-on condition, although we suspect this is a spurious finding. There was no difference in the average number of edited movement artifacts across conditions.
Potential benefits of encasing the VPP probe with a protective cover include enhanced participant safety and comfort, especially if assessing genital responses of high-risk or immunocompromised samples. The use of a cover complies with current guidelines for reprocessing semi-critical medical devices (eg, vaginal ultrasound probes) in many regions.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Although the idea of a VPP probe cover had been discussed among sexual psychophysiology researchers, this is the first study to empirically test whether a cover could jeopardize VPP data. Potential limitations include the use of a 10-Hz VPP sampling rate and a cover that was not tailored to the size of the VPP probe.
Placing a protective cover on the VPP probe did not appear to meaningfully impact sexual arousal or the VPP data. Based on these results and the potential advantages of a protective cover, researchers may wish to integrate the use a condom cover in their experiment protocols and clinical applications. Sawatsky ML, Lalumière ML. Effect of a Condom Cover on Vaginal Photoplethysmographic Responses. J Sex Med 2020; 17:702-715.
阴道光体积描记法(VPP)是一种可重复使用的阴道内设备,常用于性心理生理学研究,以评估阴道血流的变化,这是性唤起的一个指标。
测试在 VPP 探头上放置一次性护套是否会影响所获得的数据。避孕套护套可以降低疾病传播的风险,并且可能会增加参与者的舒适度,但可能会对 VPP 信号产生负面影响。
采用 25 名顺性别女性(平均年龄 21.3 岁,标准差 2.6)的 within-subjects 设计,使用 VPP 在 2 种条件下评估生殖器反应:有和没有聚异戊二烯避孕套护套。通过性唤起视听短片刺激来诱发性反应,这些短片的性唤起强度不同:非性(非性的男女互动)、低强度性(裸体运动)和高强度性(男女性交)。女性在刺激呈现期间连续评估自己的性唤起程度。
阴道脉搏振幅的变化和自我报告的性唤起。
发现护套取下和护套套上这两种条件下,每种刺激类别的性反应幅度和整体结果模式都非常相似。高强度性刺激类别引起的性反应大于所有其他类别。只有在护套套上的条件下,低强度性刺激类别才引起了(较小的)生殖器反应,但我们怀疑这是一个虚假的发现。两种条件下的平均运动伪影数量没有差异。
用保护性护套包裹 VPP 探头的潜在好处包括增强参与者的安全性和舒适度,特别是在评估高风险或免疫功能低下的样本的生殖器反应时。在许多地区,使用护套符合对半关键医疗设备(如阴道超声探头)进行再处理的现行指南。
尽管性心理生理学家已经讨论过 VPP 探头护套的想法,但这是第一项对护套是否会危及 VPP 数据进行实证检验的研究。潜在的局限性包括使用 10Hz 的 VPP 采样率和未根据 VPP 探头尺寸定制的护套。
在 VPP 探头上放置保护性护套似乎并没有对性唤起或 VPP 数据产生有意义的影响。基于这些结果和护套的潜在优势,研究人员可能希望在他们的实验方案和临床应用中整合使用避孕套护套。Sawatsky ML,Lalumière ML。避孕套对阴道光体积描记法反应的影响。性医学杂志 2020;17:702-715。