• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究社区药剂师进行的药物使用评估(西梅农)的影响:患者报告的结局指标。

Studying the impact of a medication use evaluation by the community pharmacist (Simenon): Patient-reported outcome measures.

作者信息

Wuyts Joke, Maesschalck Joris, De Wulf Isabelle, De Lepeleire Jan, Foulon Veerle

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 O&N2 box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Association of Pharmacists Belgium, Archimedesstraat 11, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Dec;16(12):1760-1767. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.017
PMID:32035870
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the SIMENON study, medication use reviews were conducted for older polymedicated home-dwelling patients across 56 Belgian community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of the service on patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures, and to evaluate the suitability of the chosen instruments.

METHODS

A before-after design was used to measure the impact of the medication use review in a subset of patients, participating in the SIMENON study. Patients completed self-report questionnaires before and 3 and 12 weeks after the intervention by letter, phone or e-mail. Six outcomes were evaluated: medication-related quality of life, adherence, self-management, patient satisfaction, fall incidents and use of emergency healthcare services.

RESULTS

Questionnaires at baseline and endpoint were available for 83 patients (median age 77 years; median of 7 drugs) of 24 pharmacies. The Living with Medicines Questionnaire showed low medication burden at baseline (84.8/205) which increased to 85.7 three weeks later (n = 57; p = 0.219). Scores significantly reduced to 81.9 at twelve weeks (p = 0.031). The Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale (n = 67) showed high median adherence scores at baseline (14/18) which remained unaltered (p = 0.974). The patient activation measure found low self-management in one third of the sample at baseline and endpoint (35.5% and 37.1% respectively; p = 0.243). The Patient Satisfaction with Pharmacist Services Questionnaire (n = 66) demonstrated high patient satisfaction. The number of patients with a hospitalization in the last three months decreased non-significantly from 14.8% to 11.1% in the post-measurement after 12 weeks (p = 0.227). No effect was observed on emergency room visits and falls.

CONCLUSIONS

The medication use review reduced medication burden but did not impact the patient's adherence and self-management. However, adherence scores were high, medication burden was low at baseline and the sample size was limited. The Living with Medicines instrument is a promising instrument for future research to assess medication-related quality of life in older polymedicated patients.

摘要

背景

在SIMENON研究中,对比利时56家社区药房中使用多种药物的居家老年患者进行了用药评估。

目的

评估该服务对患者报告的结局指标和患者报告的体验指标的影响,并评估所选工具的适用性。

方法

采用前后设计来衡量用药评估对参与SIMENON研究的部分患者的影响。患者在干预前、干预后3周和12周通过信件、电话或电子邮件完成自我报告问卷。评估了六个结局:与药物相关的生活质量、依从性、自我管理、患者满意度、跌倒事件和紧急医疗服务的使用情况。

结果

24家药房的83名患者(中位年龄77岁;中位用药7种)有基线和终点的问卷数据。《药物生活问卷》显示基线时药物负担较低(84.8/205),3周后增至85.7(n = 57;p = 0.219)。12周时得分显著降至81.9(p = 0.031)。《概率性药物依从性量表》(n = 67)显示基线时中位依从性得分较高(14/18),且保持不变(p = 0.974)。患者激活度测量发现,基线和终点时三分之一的样本自我管理能力较低(分别为35.5%和37.1%;p = 0.243)。《药剂师服务患者满意度问卷》(n = 66)显示患者满意度较高。在12周后的测量中,过去三个月内住院患者的比例从14.8%降至11.1%,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.227)。未观察到对急诊就诊和跌倒的影响。

结论

用药评估降低了药物负担,但未影响患者的依从性和自我管理。然而,依从性得分较高,基线时药物负担较低,且样本量有限。《药物生活》工具是未来研究中评估使用多种药物的老年患者与药物相关生活质量的一个有前景的工具。

相似文献

1
Studying the impact of a medication use evaluation by the community pharmacist (Simenon): Patient-reported outcome measures.研究社区药剂师进行的药物使用评估(西梅农)的影响:患者报告的结局指标。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Dec;16(12):1760-1767. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
2
Studying the impact of a medication use evaluation for polymedicated older patients by the community pharmacist (SIMENON): study protocol.研究社区药剂师对多药治疗老年患者进行药物使用评估的影响(SIMENON):研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3440-z.
3
Studying the impact of a medication use evaluation by the community pharmacist (Simenon): Drug-related problems and associated variables.研究社区药剂师进行的药物使用评估(西梅农)的影响:药物相关问题及相关变量。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1100-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
4
Does a pharmacist-led medication use review improve medication adherence in polymedicated aged patients? Methodological choices matter!是否由药剂师主导的药物使用审查能改善高龄多重用药患者的药物依从性?方法选择很重要!
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1343-1352. doi: 10.1111/jep.13567. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Impact of pharmacist-led shared medication reviews on adherence among polymedicated older patients: an observational retrospective French study.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):150-156.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
Medication management among home-dwelling older patients with chronic diseases: possible roles for community pharmacists.慢性病居家老年患者的药物管理:社区药师的可能作用。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2012 Aug;16(8):721-6. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0028-x.
7
Impact of Pharmacists' Interventions and Patients' Decision on Health Outcomes in Terms of Medication Adherence and Quality Use of Medicines among Patients Attending Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review.社区药房中,药师干预和患者决策对药物依从性和药物合理使用的健康结局的影响:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094392.
8
Home medication management review in outpatients with chronic diseases in Jordan: a randomized control trial.约旦慢性病门诊患者的家庭用药管理评估:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):404-13. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0266-9. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
9
Low perceived service quality in community pharmacy is associated with poor medication adherence.社区药店服务质量感知低与药物依从性差有关。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Evaluating the implementation fidelity of New Medicines Service for asthma patients in community pharmacies in Belgium.评估比利时社区药房针对哮喘患者的新药服务的实施保真度。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jan-Feb;13(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and influencing factors of medication-related burden among patients with late-life depression in typical city of eastern China: a cross-sectional study.中国东部典型城市老年抑郁症患者药物相关负担的患病率及影响因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3521. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20939-2.
2
Patient Satisfaction With Public Pharmacy Services: Structural and Policy Implications From Greece.患者对公共药房服务的满意度:来自希腊的结构与政策启示
Cureus. 2024 Apr 20;16(4):e58654. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58654. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
The Impact of Pharmacist Medication Reviews on Geriatric Patients: A Scoping Review.
药剂师药物评估对老年患者的影响:一项范围综述
Korean J Fam Med. 2024 May;45(3):125-133. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.23.0220. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
4
Community pharmacists' perceptions on multidisciplinary heart failure care: an exploratory qualitative study.社区药剂师对多学科心力衰竭护理的看法:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09661-8.
5
Preparing for the spread of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection from primary care to community pharmacy: a mixed-methods study.为患者报告结局(PRO)数据收集从初级保健向社区药房的推广做准备:一项混合方法研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Mar 14;3(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00277-3.
6
Exploring polypharmacy burden among elderly patients with chronic diseases in Chinese community: a cross-sectional study.探究中国社区慢性病老年患者的多重用药负担:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 13;21(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02247-1.
7
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Testing of Chinese Version of the Living with Medicines Questionnaire in Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases.慢性病老年患者药物治疗生活问卷中文版的跨文化调适与信度测试
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Dec 17;14:2477-2487. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S275006. eCollection 2020.