Transplant Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Organ Transplant Institute, 8th Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Transplant Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jun;230(6):853-861.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.039. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been deemed detrimental to kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes. Breakthrough HCV treatment with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications improved the probability of HCV+ kidney use for KT even in noninfected (HCV-) recipients. We hypothesized that recipient HCV infection influences deceased donor KT outcomes, and this effect could be modified by donor HCV status and use of DAAs.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network as of September 2018. A mate kidneys analysis was performed with HCV+ and HCV- recipients of solitary adult KT from ABO-compatible deceased donor between January 1994 and June 2018. We selected donors where 1 KT recipient was HCV+ and the mate kidney recipient was HCV-. Both HCV- and HCV+ donors were identified and analyzed separately. Outcomes, including survival of patients, grafts, and death-censored grafts, were compared between the groups.
Four-hundred and twenty-five HCV+ and 5,575 HCV- donor mate kidneys were transplanted in HCV-discrepant recipients. HCV+ recipients of HCV- donor had worse patient and graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37 and adjusted hazard ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.34, respectively) and death-censored grafts (adjusted hazard ratio 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.34) compared with HCV- recipients. Comparable patient and graft survival and death-censored grafts were found in recipients of HCV+ donors, regardless of recipient HCV status. The risk associated with HCV positivity in donors or recipients in the pre-DAA era (before December 2013) was no longer statistically significant in the post-DAA era.
Given comparable outcomes between HCV+ and HCV- recipients in post-DAA era or when receiving HCV+ donor kidneys, broader use of HCV+ kidneys regardless of the recipient's HCV status should be advocated, and allocation algorithm for HCV+ kidneys should be revised.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染被认为对肾移植(KT)结果有害。直接作用抗病毒(DAA)药物突破性治疗 HCV 提高了 HCV+肾脏用于 KT 的可能性,即使在未感染(HCV-)受者中也是如此。我们假设受者 HCV 感染会影响已故供体 KT 结果,并且这种影响可以通过供者 HCV 状态和 DAA 的使用来改变。
我们基于截至 2018 年 9 月的器官获取与移植网络数据进行了回顾性队列研究。对 1994 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间来自 ABO 相容已故供体的单器官成人 KT 的 HCV+和 HCV-受者进行了配对肾脏分析。我们选择了 1 个 KT 受者为 HCV+而配对肾脏受者为 HCV-的供体。分别对 HCV-和 HCV+供体进行了鉴定和分析。比较了各组之间患者、移植物和死亡相关移植物的存活情况。
在 HCV 不一致的受者中移植了 425 例 HCV+和 5575 例 HCV-供体配对肾脏。HCV-受者接受 HCV-供体的患者和移植物存活率较差(调整后的危险比 1.28;95%CI,1.19 至 1.37 和调整后的危险比 1.26;95%CI,1.18 至 1.34)和死亡相关移植物(调整后的危险比 1.24;95%CI,1.15 至 1.34)与 HCV-受者相比。无论受者 HCV 状态如何,在 HCV+供体受者中都发现了类似的患者和移植物存活率以及死亡相关移植物。在 DAA 时代(2013 年 12 月之前)之前,供者或受者 HCV 阳性相关的风险在 DAA 时代后不再具有统计学意义。
鉴于 DAA 时代或接受 HCV+供体肾脏时 HCV+和 HCV-受者之间的结果相当,应提倡无论受者 HCV 状态如何,更广泛地使用 HCV+肾脏,并且应修订 HCV+肾脏的分配算法。