University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Dec;15(5):396-406. doi: 10.1177/1556264620903563. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
Several frameworks assist research ethics committees (RECs) in risk assessment of medical studies. However, little is known about how researchers describe risks of the procedures in study protocols and participant information sheets. We examined 349 study protocols and participant information sheets submitted to an REC and evaluated the risk assessments performed for 1,510 study procedures. Risks had been assessed for 399 (26%) procedures in study protocols and for 425 (28%) procedures in participant information sheets. Physical risks were assessed six times more frequently than psychological risks. Risks of medical procedures are not always detailed in study protocols or participant information sheets. Risk descriptions of procedures believed to be familiar to potential participants may be omitted.
几种框架有助于研究伦理委员会 (REC) 对医学研究的风险评估。然而,对于研究人员在研究方案和参与者信息表中如何描述程序风险知之甚少。我们检查了提交给一个 REC 的 349 个研究方案和参与者信息表,并对 1510 个研究程序进行了风险评估。在研究方案中对 399 个(26%)程序进行了风险评估,在参与者信息表中对 425 个(28%)程序进行了风险评估。物理风险的评估频率是心理风险的六倍。研究方案或参与者信息表中并不总是详细说明医疗程序的风险。对于那些被认为是潜在参与者熟悉的程序的风险描述可能会被省略。