Hansen Sarah J Z, Tang Peipei, Kiefer Anthony, Galles Kevin, Wong Connie, Morovic Wesley
DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences, Madison, WI, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 22;10:3025. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03025. eCollection 2019.
Traditional microbiological enumeration methods have long been employed as the standard evaluation procedure for probiotic microorganisms. These methods are labor intensive, have long-time to results and inherently have a high degree of variability - up to 35%. As clinical probiotic and microbiome science continues to grow and develop, it is increasingly important that researchers thoroughly define and deliver the targeted probiotic dose. Furthermore, to establish high quality commercial products, the same dosage level must be administered to consumers. An ISO method for the use of flow cytometry has been established which does speed up the time to results and reduce variability, but the method has not yet gained widespread adoption across the probiotic industry. This is possibly due to expertise needed to implement and maintain a new testing platform in an established quality system. In this study we compare enumeration using plate counts and flow cytometry to the use of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which in addition to giving faster time to results than plate count and less variability than both plate count and flow cytometry, has additional benefits such as strain-specific counts. Use of ddPCR gives the ability to design primers to target deletions and single base pair differences which will allow for strain profiling in microbiome analyses. We demonstrate that ddPCR probiotic enumeration results are positively correlated to both plate count and flow cytometry results and should be considered a viable, next generation enumeration method for the evaluation of probiotics.
传统的微生物计数方法长期以来一直被用作益生菌微生物的标准评估程序。这些方法劳动强度大,出结果时间长,而且固有地具有高度的变异性——高达35%。随着临床益生菌和微生物组科学的不断发展,研究人员全面定义并提供目标益生菌剂量变得越来越重要。此外,为了建立高质量的商业产品,必须向消费者施用相同的剂量水平。已经建立了一种使用流式细胞术的ISO方法,该方法确实加快了出结果的时间并降低了变异性,但该方法尚未在益生菌行业中广泛采用。这可能是由于在既定的质量体系中实施和维护新的测试平台需要专业知识。在本研究中,我们将平板计数和流式细胞术的计数方法与 droplet digital PCR(ddPCR)的使用进行了比较,ddPCR 除了比平板计数出结果更快、比平板计数和流式细胞术的变异性更小之外,还有其他优点,如菌株特异性计数。使用 ddPCR 能够设计引物以靶向缺失和单碱基对差异,这将允许在微生物组分析中进行菌株分析。我们证明,ddPCR 益生菌计数结果与平板计数和流式细胞术结果呈正相关,应被视为评估益生菌的一种可行的下一代计数方法。