Department of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Department of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;59(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.11.004.
To compare pregnancy outcomes resulting from the use of cervical cerclage for different indications and investigate factors that might influence the clinical effects of cervical cerclage.
This was a retrospective study of pregnant women who received cervical cerclage in The Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. Patients were divided into three groups: a history-indicated group; an ultrasound-indicated group and a physical examination-indicated group. The pregnancy outcomes of the three groups were then compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the independent risk factors.
Statistical differences were evident when the history-indicated group and the ultrasound-indicated group were compared with the physical examination-indicated group for gestational age at delivery [37.3(33.3-38.9), 35.4(28.9-38.4) vs. 26.1 (24.3-28.4) weeks, respectively, P < 0.05], percentage of cases delivered at < 28 weeks of gestation (13.4%, 20.3% vs. 74.3%, respectively, P < 0.05), percentage of cases delivered at < 37 weeks of gestation (42.7%, 54.2% vs. 91.4%, respectively, P < 0.05) and fetal survival rate (88.4%, 81.4% vs. 40.0%, respectively, P < 0.05). The history-indicated group and the ultrasound-indicated group were similar with regards to these outcomes. The independent risk factors affecting the clinical effects of cervical cerclage include age, body mass index (BMI), history of prior preterm birth and second-trimester loss, C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/L and cervical dilation ≥3 cm (P < 0.05).
Pregnancy outcomes were similar when compared between history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Serial cervical surveillance is beneficial for pregnant with a history of cervical insufficiency, and the placement of cervical cerclages in response to ultrasonographically detected shortening of the cervical length is a medically acceptable alternative to the use of history-indicated cerclage.
比较不同适应证下宫颈环扎术的妊娠结局,并探讨可能影响宫颈环扎术临床效果的因素。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入在浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院行宫颈环扎术的孕妇。患者分为三组:病史指征组、超声指征组和体格检查指征组。比较三组的妊娠结局。采用单因素和多因素 logistic 回归分析评估独立危险因素。
与体格检查指征组相比,病史指征组和超声指征组的分娩时孕周[37.3(33.3-38.9)、35.4(28.9-38.4)vs. 26.1(24.3-28.4)周]、<28 周分娩的比例[13.4%、20.3%vs. 74.3%]、<37 周分娩的比例[42.7%、54.2%vs. 91.4%]和胎儿存活率[88.4%、81.4%vs. 40.0%]差异有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。病史指征组和超声指征组的上述结局相似。影响宫颈环扎术临床效果的独立危险因素包括年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、既往早产史和中孕期流产史、C 反应蛋白(CRP)>5mg/L 和宫颈扩张≥3cm(均 P<0.05)。
病史指征和超声指征下的妊娠结局相似。对有宫颈机能不全病史的孕妇进行连续宫颈监测,对超声检测到宫颈长度缩短的孕妇行宫颈环扎术是一种可接受的替代病史指征下宫颈环扎术的方法。