Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, # 0507, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Medical School Office Building, Rm 328, 1265 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2020 May 1;35(4):416-423. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz174.
The importance of community engagement (CE) for health system resilience is established in theoretical and empirical literature. The practical dimensions of how to operationalize theory and implement its principles have been less explored, especially within low-resource crisis settings. It is therefore unclear how CE is drawn upon and how, if at all, it facilitates health system resilience in times of health system crises. To address this critical gap, we adapt and apply existing theoretical CE frameworks to analyse qualitative data from 92 in-depth interviews and 16 focus group discussions collected with health system stakeholders in Liberia in the aftermath of the 2014-15 Ebola outbreak. Health system stakeholders indicated that CE was a crucial contributing factor in addressing the Ebola epidemic in Liberia. Multiple forms of CE were used during the outbreak; however, only some forms were perceived as meaningful, such as the formation of community-based surveillance teams. To achieve meaningful CE, participants recommended that communities be treated as active participants in-as opposed to passive recipients of-health response efforts and that communication platforms for CE be established ahead of a crisis. Participant responses highlight that meaningful CE led to improved communication with and increased trust in health authorities and programming. This facilitated health system response efforts, leading to a fortuitous cycle of increased trust, improved communication and continued meaningful CE-all necessary conditions for health system resilience. This study refines our understanding of CE and demonstrates the ways in which meaningful CE and trust work together in mutually reinforcing and beneficial ways. These findings provide empirical evidence on which to base policies and programmes aimed at improving health system resilience in low-resource settings to more effectively respond to health system crises.
社区参与(CE)对卫生系统弹性的重要性在理论和实证文献中得到了确立。如何将理论付诸实践并实施其原则的实际方面探讨较少,尤其是在资源匮乏的危机环境中。因此,尚不清楚如何利用 CE,以及在卫生系统危机时期,它是否以及如何促进卫生系统的弹性。为了解决这一关键差距,我们适应和应用现有的理论 CE 框架,以分析利比里亚卫生系统利益相关者在 2014-2015 年埃博拉疫情后收集的 92 次深入访谈和 16 次焦点小组讨论的定性数据。卫生系统利益相关者表示,CE 是解决利比里亚埃博拉疫情的一个关键因素。在疫情期间采用了多种形式的 CE;然而,只有一些形式被认为是有意义的,例如组建社区为基础的监测小组。为了实现有意义的 CE,参与者建议将社区视为卫生应对工作的积极参与者,而不是被动接受者,并在危机发生前建立 CE 的沟通平台。参与者的回应强调,有意义的 CE 导致了与卫生当局和规划人员的沟通改善和信任增加。这促进了卫生系统的应对工作,形成了一个良性循环,即信任增加、沟通改善和持续的有意义的 CE——所有这些都是卫生系统弹性的必要条件。这项研究深化了我们对 CE 的理解,并展示了有意义的 CE 和信任如何以相互增强和有益的方式共同发挥作用。这些发现为旨在提高资源匮乏环境中卫生系统弹性的政策和方案提供了实证依据,以便更有效地应对卫生系统危机。