Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Medical Faculty, University of Vilnius, Vilnius, Lithuania.
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1033-9.
Evidence concerning periodontal practice in Eastern European countries is scarce. The aim of the present study was to investigate periodontal risk knowledge, patient management and self-perceived confidence among General Dentists (GDs) from five Eastern European regarding their provision of periodontal care.
GDs from Belarus, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova and Romania participated in a questionnaire survey. Power calculations were used to identify the sample size for each country. The structured questionnaire included several domains of inquiry. The socio-demographic domain inquired about dentist's age, gender and years of clinical experience. The dental practice domain inquired about practice location, practising or not practising in a group practice and having or not having a periodontist or a dental hygienist in the practice. The distributions of answers across-countries were compared employing one way ANOVA (comparison of means) or Chi square test (comparison of proportions). For each country, the predictors of the study outcomes: a summative knowledge score for periodontal risks and dentist's confidence level were identified employing either linear or logistic multiple regression models.
The sample comprised 390 Belarussian, 488 Lithuanian, 349 Macedonian, 316 Moldovan, and 401 Romanian GDs. The majority of GDs (~ 80%) practiced in urban areas. Age and gender distributions differed significantly among countries. Significant across-country differences were found regarding working/not working in a group practice, having/not having access to a periodontist/dental hygienist and in proportions of patients receiving periodontal treatments or being referred to specialists. None of Macedonian patients nor the majority of Moldovan patients (78%) were referred to periodontists. There were also significant across-country differences in diagnosis, patient management and periodontal knowledge. Only in the Lithuanian cohort were dentists' confidence levels associated significantly with their knowledge. In all countries, taking a medical history was a consistent and significant predictor of having higher periodontal knowledge score. Except in Belarus, periodontal risk assessment was a significantly consistent predictor of certainty levels associated with the provision of periodontal treatments.
There were substantial differences among GDs in the five countries regarding diagnosis, dentist's confidence and management of periodontal patients.
东欧国家的牙周病治疗证据有限。本研究的目的是调查来自五个东欧国家的普通牙医(GDs)在提供牙周护理方面的牙周病风险知识、患者管理和自我认知信心。
白俄罗斯、立陶宛、马其顿、摩尔多瓦和罗马尼亚的 GDs 参与了问卷调查。使用幂计算确定了每个国家的样本量。结构化问卷包括多个查询领域。社会人口统计学领域询问了牙医的年龄、性别和临床经验年限。牙科实践领域询问了实践地点、是否在团体实践中实践以及实践中是否有牙周病专家或口腔卫生师。采用单向方差分析(均值比较)或卡方检验(比例比较)比较各国之间的答案分布。对于每个国家,采用线性或逻辑多元回归模型确定研究结果的预测因素:牙周病风险的综合知识得分和牙医的信心水平。
样本包括 390 名白俄罗斯 GDs、488 名立陶宛 GDs、349 名马其顿 GDs、316 名摩尔多瓦 GDs 和 401 名罗马尼亚 GDs。大多数 GDs(~80%)在城市地区执业。年龄和性别分布在各国之间存在显著差异。在是否在团体实践中工作、是否能够获得牙周病专家/口腔卫生师以及接受牙周治疗或转诊给专家的患者比例方面,存在显著的国家间差异。马其顿的患者没有一个,摩尔多瓦的大多数患者(78%)都没有被转诊给牙周病专家。在诊断、患者管理和牙周知识方面也存在显著的国家间差异。只有在立陶宛队列中,牙医的信心水平与他们的知识显著相关。在所有国家,询问病史都是具有更高牙周知识得分的一致且显著的预测因素。除了白俄罗斯,牙周病风险评估也是与提供牙周治疗相关的确定性水平的一致显著预测因素。
在五个国家的 GDs 中,在诊断、牙医的信心和牙周病患者管理方面存在很大差异。