Yan Wenqiang, Xu Xingquan, Xu Qian, Sun Ziying, Chen Dongyang, Xu Zhihong, Jiang Qing, Shi Dongquan
State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Department of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China.
Laboratory for Bone and Joint Disease, Model Animal Research Center (MARC), Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(24):799. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.12.71.
The factors that influence functions of knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) still remains uncertain. The functional restoration of knees after ACLR can be reflected on gait kinematics restoration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the gait kinematics and clinical outcomes of knees after anatomical and non-anatomical single-bundle ACLR during level walking.
Thirty-four patients with unilateral primary single-bundle ACLR and 18 healthy people were recruited. Patients were divided into anatomical reconstruction group (AR group; n=13) and non-anatomical reconstruction group (Non-AR group; n=21) according to Bernard Quadrant method. The ACL graft orientations on coronal and sagittal planes were measured on 3D models from medical images. The 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) kinematics of knees and range of motion (ROM) of 6 DOF kinematics were measured with a portable optical tracking system. The comparison of 6 DOF kinematics and ROM of 6 DOF kinematics were performed between the ACLR knees and contralateral knees. The following assessments were also performed including clinical examination, KT-2000 arthrometer measurement, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores.
All patients reached a minimum follow-up of 6 months (10±4 months). For AR group and Non-AR group, no statistically significant differences were observed in gait kinematics between the ACLR knees and contralateral knees. No statistically significant differences between the ACLR knees and contralateral knees were observed in terms of ROM of 6 DOF kinematics in AR group. However, in Non-AR group, the ACLR knees exhibited significant ROM of anterior-posterior translation by approximately 0.5 cm than contralateral knees (P=0.0080). No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed regarding IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score and KT-2000 arthrometer test.
The anatomical ACLR can restore close to normal gait kinematics and ROM of 6 DOF kinematics compared with non-anatomical ACLR. The ACL graft after anatomical ACLR simulated native ACL fibers to function in terms of graft orientation.
前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后影响膝关节功能的因素仍不明确。ACLR术后膝关节的功能恢复可通过步态运动学恢复来体现。本研究旨在评估解剖学单束ACLR和非解剖学单束ACLR术后膝关节在平步行走时的步态运动学及临床结局。
招募34例单侧原发性单束ACLR患者和18名健康人。根据伯纳德象限法将患者分为解剖重建组(AR组;n = 13)和非解剖重建组(非AR组;n = 21)。从医学影像的3D模型上测量ACL移植物在冠状面和矢状面上的方向。使用便携式光学跟踪系统测量膝关节的6自由度(DOF)运动学及6 DOF运动学的活动范围(ROM)。对ACLR膝关节与对侧膝关节的6 DOF运动学及6 DOF运动学的ROM进行比较。还进行了以下评估,包括临床检查、KT - 2000关节测量仪测量、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和Lysholm评分。
所有患者的最短随访时间均达到6个月(10±4个月)。对于AR组和非AR组,ACLR膝关节与对侧膝关节在步态运动学方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。AR组在6 DOF运动学的ROM方面,ACLR膝关节与对侧膝关节之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。然而,在非AR组中,ACLR膝关节的前后平移ROM比其对侧膝关节显著大约0.5厘米(P = 0.0080)。两组在IKDC主观评分、Lysholm评分和KT - 2000关节测量仪测试方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
与非解剖学ACLR相比,解剖学ACLR可使步态运动学及6 DOF运动学的ROM恢复至接近正常。解剖学ACLR术后的ACL移植物在移植物方向方面模拟了天然ACL纤维的功能。