地塞米松治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项多中心、随机对照试验。

Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Multidisciplinary Organ Dysfunction Evaluation Research Network, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Keenan Research Center for Biomedical Science at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Mar;8(3):267-276. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30417-5. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no proven specific pharmacological treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The efficacy of corticosteroids in ARDS remains controversial. We aimed to assess the effects of dexamethasone in ARDS, which might change pulmonary and systemic inflammation and result in a decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in a network of 17 intensive care units (ICUs) in teaching hospitals across Spain in patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS (defined by a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen of 200 mm Hg or less assessed with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cm HO or more and FiO of 0·5 or more at 24 h after ARDS onset). Patients with brain death, terminal-stage disease, or receiving corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs were excluded. Eligible patients were randomly assigned based on balanced treatment assignments with a computerised randomisation allocation sequence using blocks of 10 opaque, sealed envelopes to receive immediate treatment with dexamethasone or continued routine intensive care (control group). Patients in the dexamethasone group received an intravenous dose of 20 mg once daily from day 1 to day 5, which was reduced to 10 mg once daily from day 6 to day 10. Patients in both groups were ventilated with lung-protective mechanical ventilation. Allocation concealment was maintained at all sites during the trial. Primary outcome was the number of ventilator-free days at 28 days, defined as the number of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation from day of randomisation to day 28. Secondary outcome was all-cause mortality 60 days after randomisation. All analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01731795.

FINDINGS

Between March 28, 2013, and Dec 31, 2018, we enrolled 277 patients and randomly assigned 139 patients to the dexamethasone group and 138 to the control group. The trial was stopped by the data safety monitoring board due to low enrolment rate after enrolling more than 88% (277/314) of the planned sample size. The mean number of ventilator-free days was higher in the dexamethasone group than in the control group (between-group difference 4·8 days [95% CI 2·57 to 7·03]; p<0·0001). At 60 days, 29 (21%) patients in the dexamethasone group and 50 (36%) patients in the control group had died (between-group difference -15·3% [-25·9 to -4·9]; p=0·0047). The proportion of adverse events did not differ significantly between the dexamethasone group and control group. The most common adverse events were hyperglycaemia in the ICU (105 [76%] patients in the dexamethasone group vs 97 [70%] patients in the control group), new infections in the ICU (eg, pneumonia or sepsis; 33 [24%] vs 35 [25%]), and barotrauma (14 [10%] vs 10 [7%]).

INTERPRETATION

Early administration of dexamethasone could reduce duration of mechanical ventilation and overall mortality in patients with established moderate-to-severe ARDS.

FUNDING

Fundación Mutua Madrileña, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, The European Regional Development's Funds, Asociación Científica Pulmón y Ventilación Mecánica.

摘要

背景

目前尚无针对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的明确的药理学治疗方法。皮质类固醇在 ARDS 中的疗效仍存在争议。我们旨在评估地塞米松在 ARDS 中的作用,这可能会改变肺部和全身炎症,并导致机械通气时间和死亡率降低。

方法

我们在西班牙教学医院的 17 个重症监护病房(ICU)网络中进行了一项多中心、随机对照试验,纳入了已经确诊的中重度 ARDS 患者(定义为动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比为 200mmHg 或以下,呼气末正压为 10cmH2O 或更高,FiO 为 0.5 或更高,在 ARDS 发病后 24 小时)。排除脑死亡、终末期疾病、正在接受皮质类固醇或免疫抑制药物治疗的患者。根据平衡治疗分配,使用 10 个不透明、密封的信封的计算机随机分配序列,将符合条件的患者随机分配至立即接受地塞米松治疗或继续常规重症监护(对照组)。地塞米松组患者从第 1 天到第 5 天每天接受 20mg 静脉注射,从第 6 天到第 10 天减少到每天 10mg。两组患者均采用肺保护性机械通气进行通气。在整个试验过程中,所有地点均保持分配隐藏。主要结局是 28 天时的无呼吸机天数,定义为随机分组至第 28 天的存活天数和无机械通气天数。次要结局是随机分组后 60 天的全因死亡率。所有分析均根据意向治疗原则进行。该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT01731795。

结果

2013 年 3 月 28 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日,我们共纳入 277 例患者,并将 139 例患者随机分配至地塞米松组,138 例患者分配至对照组。由于在计划样本量的 88%(277/314)以上入组后入组率较低,数据安全监测委员会停止了试验。地塞米松组的无呼吸机天数中位数高于对照组(组间差异 4.8 天[95%CI 2.57 至 7.03];p<0.0001)。在 60 天时,地塞米松组有 29 例(21%)患者和对照组有 50 例(36%)患者死亡(组间差异-15.3%[-25.9 至-4.9];p=0.0047)。地塞米松组和对照组的不良事件发生率无显著差异。最常见的不良事件是 ICU 内的高血糖症(地塞米松组 105 例[76%] vs 对照组 97 例[70%])、ICU 内新发感染(如肺炎或败血症;33 例[24%] vs 35 例[25%])和气压伤(14 例[10%] vs 对照组 10 例[7%])。

结论

早期给予地塞米松可降低中重度 ARDS 患者的机械通气时间和总死亡率。

资助

马德里Mutua Madrileña 基金会、西班牙卡洛斯三世健康研究所、欧洲区域发展基金、呼吸和机械通气协会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索