Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
J Surg Res. 2020 Jun;250:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.020. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
The benefits of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for trauma patients have been well established. However, the ACA's impact on penetrating trauma patients (PTPs), a population that is historically young and uninsured, has not been defined. We hypothesized that PTPs in the post-ACA era would have better outcomes.
The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried for all PTPs from 2009 (pre-ACA) and 2011-2014 (post-ACA). Subset analysis was performed in patients aged 19-25 y, as this group was eligible for the ACA's dependent care provision (DCP).
There were 9,714,471 patients in the study, with 2,053,501 (21.1%) pre-ACA and 7,660,970 (78.9%) post-ACA. When compared to pre-ACA, patients in the post-ACA cohort were more likely to have commercial/private insurance, less likely to have Medicaid, and more likely to be uninsured. On logistic regression, the pre-ACA era was associated with mortality (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, P = 0.004). Being uninsured was associated with mortality (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.87-1.92, P < 0.001). On subset analysis of the DCP age group, post-ACA patients were more likely to be uninsured (24.1% versus 17.6%; P < 0.001). In addition, for the DCP age group, pre-ACA era was not associated with mortality (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.06, P = 0.20).
Although the ACA provided a survival benefit to PTPs overall, it did not increase insurance coverage for this population. In addition, the DCP of the ACA did not improve insurance access for PTP in the eligible age group. Further efforts are needed to extend insurance access to this population.
平价医疗法案(ACA)为创伤患者带来了诸多益处,这一点已得到充分证实。然而,ACA 对创伤性穿透伤患者(PTP)的影响尚未明确,这一人群历来较为年轻且没有保险。我们假设 ACA 实施后,PTP 的预后会更好。
我们从全国创伤数据库(NTDB)中检索了 2009 年(ACA 实施前)和 2011-2014 年(ACA 实施后)所有 PTP 的数据。在年龄为 19-25 岁的患者中进行了亚组分析,因为这一年龄段的患者符合 ACA 中关于依赖护理条款(DCP)的规定。
研究共纳入 9714471 例患者,其中 2053501 例(21.1%)来自 ACA 实施前,7660970 例(78.9%)来自 ACA 实施后。与 ACA 实施前相比,ACA 实施后患者更有可能拥有商业/私人保险,更少可能拥有医疗补助,且更有可能没有保险。多因素 logistic 回归分析显示,ACA 实施前与死亡率升高相关(HR:1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.04,P=0.004)。无保险与死亡率升高相关(HR:1.89,95%CI:1.87-1.92,P<0.001)。在 DCP 年龄段的亚组分析中,ACA 实施后患者无保险的比例更高(24.1%比 17.6%;P<0.001)。此外,对于 DCP 年龄段的患者,ACA 实施前与死亡率升高不相关(HR:1.03,95%CI:0.99-1.06,P=0.20)。
尽管 ACA 总体上为 PTP 提供了生存获益,但并未增加这一人群的保险覆盖范围。此外,ACA 的 DCP 并未改善符合条件年龄段的 PTP 的保险可及性。需要进一步努力扩大这一人群的保险覆盖范围。