Chen Lihong, Himmelfarb Eric A, Sun Melissa, Choi Eunice K, Fan Lifang, Lai Jinping, Kim Christopher J, Xu Haodong, Wang Hanlin L
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles.
Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2020 Feb;28(2):146-153. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000723.
Histopathologic diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in posttransplant liver biopsies is challenging. The recently proposed diagnostic criteria by the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology require positive C4d immunohistochemical staining to establish the diagnosis. However, the reported C4d staining patterns vary widely in different studies. One potential explanation may be due to different antibody preparations used by different investigators. In this study, posttransplant liver biopsies from 69 patients histopathologically diagnosed with acute cellular rejection, chronic rejection, or recurrent hepatitis C were immunohistochemically stained using 2 polyclonal anti-C4d antibodies. On the basis of the distribution of C4d immunoreactivity, 5 different staining patterns were observed: portal vein and capillary, hepatic artery, portal stroma, central vein, and sinusoids. The frequency, extent, and intensity of positive C4d staining with the 2 antibody preparations differed significantly for portal veins/capillaries and central veins, but not for hepatic arteries and portal stroma. Positive sinusoidal staining was seen in only 1 case. There were no significant differences in the frequency, extent, and intensity of positive C4d staining among the acute cellular rejection, chronic rejection, and recurrent hepatitis C groups with the 2 anti-C4d antibodies. These data show that different anti-C4d antibodies can show different staining patterns, which may lead to different interpretation. Caution is thus needed when selecting C4d antibodies for clinical use to aid in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection.
移植后肝脏活检中抗体介导性排斥反应的组织病理学诊断具有挑战性。肝脏移植病理学班夫工作组最近提出的诊断标准要求C4d免疫组化染色呈阳性才能确诊。然而,在不同研究中报道的C4d染色模式差异很大。一个可能的解释可能是不同研究者使用了不同的抗体制剂。在本研究中,对69例经组织病理学诊断为急性细胞性排斥反应、慢性排斥反应或丙型肝炎复发的移植后肝脏活检标本,使用2种多克隆抗C4d抗体进行免疫组化染色。根据C4d免疫反应性的分布,观察到5种不同的染色模式:门静脉和毛细血管、肝动脉、门管区间质、中央静脉和肝血窦。两种抗体制剂对门静脉/毛细血管和中央静脉的C4d阳性染色频率、范围和强度差异显著,但对肝动脉和门管区间质则无差异。仅1例出现肝血窦阳性染色。两种抗C4d抗体在急性细胞性排斥反应、慢性排斥反应和丙型肝炎复发组中,C4d阳性染色的频率、范围和强度均无显著差异。这些数据表明,不同的抗C4d抗体可呈现不同的染色模式,这可能导致不同的解读。因此,在选择用于临床辅助诊断抗体介导性排斥反应的C4d抗体时需谨慎。