• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左束支区域起搏时的心电图形态:特征、潜在机制和临床意义。

Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications.

机构信息

Heart Center, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;43(3):297-307. doi: 10.1111/pace.13884. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1111/pace.13884
PMID:32045008
Abstract

AIMS

In this study, we investigated the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which have not been systematically described.

METHODS

Patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing underwent LBBAP attempts. The ECGs of patients with confirmed left bundle branch (LBB) capture were compared with those of individuals with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on 12-lead ECG. Intracardiac electrograms recorded during implantation were analyzed in all patients who underwent pacing.

RESULTS

LBBAP was successfully achieved in 87.5% (56/64) of patients. The QRS morphologies in lead V during LBBAP, which typically demonstrated Qr (60.7%), qR (19.6%), rSR' (7.1%), or QS (12.5%) patterns, differed from those of native RBBB, which featured rsR' (57.5%), M shape (23.7%), or monophasic R patterns (18.7%). The terminal R' wave duration in lead V was significantly shorter during LBBAP than during native RBBB (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p < 0.001). LBB potentials were recorded in 66.1% (37/56) of the LBBAP patients. No significant differences in ECG characteristics were found between LBBAP with and without recorded LBB potentials. The presence of bundle branch block during LBBAP significantly prolonged QRS duration, R wave peak time, and terminal R' wave duration in lead V .

CONCLUSION

LBBAP-ECG patterns are characterized by a shorter terminal R' wave duration in lead V compared with that of native RBBB configurations. Bundle branch conduction integrity has an impact on ECG characteristics during LBBAP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)时心电图(ECG)形态的特征和潜在机制,这些特征尚未得到系统描述。

方法

有永久性心脏起搏适应证的患者进行 LBBAP 尝试。将心电图确诊为左束支(LBB)捕获的患者与心电图呈右束支阻滞(RBBB)的患者进行比较。对所有接受起搏的患者,在植入过程中记录心内电图并进行分析。

结果

LBBAP 在 87.5%(56/64)的患者中成功实现。LBBAP 时 V 导联的 QRS 形态通常为 Qr(60.7%)、qR(19.6%)、rSR'(7.1%)或 QS(12.5%),与典型的 RBBB 不同,后者具有 rsR'(57.5%)、M 形(23.7%)或单相 R 形(18.7%)。与原生 RBBB 相比,LBBAP 时 V 导联的终末 R'波持续时间明显缩短(51±12ms 比 85±19ms,p<0.001)。在 66.1%(37/56)的 LBBAP 患者中记录到 LBB 电位。记录到 LBB 电位的 LBBAP 患者与未记录到 LBB 电位的 LBBAP 患者的心电图特征无显著差异。LBBAP 期间存在束支传导阻滞显著延长了 V 导联的 QRS 持续时间、R 波峰值时间和终末 R'波持续时间。

结论

LBBAP-ECG 形态的特征是 V 导联的终末 R'波持续时间较原生 RBBB 构型缩短。束支传导完整性对 LBBAP 期间的心电图特征有影响。

相似文献

1
Electrocardiographic morphology during left bundle branch area pacing: Characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications.左束支区域起搏时的心电图形态:特征、潜在机制和临床意义。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;43(3):297-307. doi: 10.1111/pace.13884. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
2
ECG patterns of successful permanent left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients with typical bundle branch block.心动过缓伴典型束支阻滞患者中成功的永久性左束支区域起搏的心电图模式。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):781-790. doi: 10.1111/pace.13982. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
3
The Implantation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with and without Bundle Branch Block.左束支区域起搏在有和无束支阻滞患者中的植入。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021 Nov;31(11):1268-1272. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.11.1268.
4
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with baseline narrow, left, or right bundle branch block QRS patterns: insights into electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features.左束支区域起搏在基线呈左束支或右束支阻滞 QRS 图形的患者中的应用:心电图和超声心动图特征的深入了解。
Europace. 2023 Feb 16;25(2):526-535. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac223.
5
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing improves mitral regurgitation and cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block.永久性左束支区域起搏改善右束支传导阻滞患者的二尖瓣反流和心功能。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04175-5.
6
An Electrocardiographic Characterization of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Induced Right Ventricular Activation Delay: A Comparison With Native Right Bundle Branch Block.左束支区域起搏诱发右心室激活延迟的心电图特征:与天然右束支传导阻滞的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 9;9:885201. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.885201. eCollection 2022.
7
Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.前瞻性评估左束支区域起搏的可行性及电生理和超声心动图特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing.左束支区域起搏与传统右心室起搏的即刻临床转归。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Aug;42(8):768-773. doi: 10.1002/clc.23215. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
LBBAP in patients with normal intrinsic QRS duration: Electrical and mechanical characteristics.正常固有 QRS 时限患者的 LBBAP:电和机械特征。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jan;44(1):82-92. doi: 10.1111/pace.14114. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
10
[Feasibility and safety of new simplified left bundle branch area pacing via nine-partition method].[通过九分区法进行新型简化左束支区域起搏的可行性与安全性]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 24;48(10):848-852. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200520-00414.

引用本文的文献

1
Injectable hydrogel electrodes as conduction highways to restore native pacing.可注射水凝胶电极作为恢复固有起搏的传导高速公路。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 2;15(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44419-0.
2
Difference of ventricular synchrony between LBBP, LBFP and LVSP: A speckle tracking echocardiographic study.左心室短轴缩短率、左心室基底部短轴缩短率与整体缩短率的心室同步性差异:斑点追踪超声心动图研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Apr;67(3):539-547. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01620-x. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
3
Alternative pacing strategies for optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy.
用于优化心脏再同步治疗的替代起搏策略。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 27;9:923394. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.923394. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparisons of electrophysiological characteristics, pacing parameters and mid- to long-term effects in right ventricular septal pacing, right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch area pacing.右室间隔部起搏、右室心尖部起搏和左束支区域起搏的电生理特征、起搏参数及中远期效果比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02855-8.
5
Characteristics of intracardiac electrogram of the interventricular septum in the left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏时心室内电图的特征。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02715-5.
6
A single-centre prospective evaluation of left bundle branch area pacemaker implantation characteristics.左束支区域起搏器植入特征的单中心前瞻性评估
Neth Heart J. 2022 May;30(5):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01679-7. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
The Physiologic Mechanisms of Paced QRS Narrowing During Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Right Bundle Branch Block Patients.右束支传导阻滞患者左束支起搏时起搏QRS波变窄的生理机制
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 9;9:835493. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.835493. eCollection 2022.
8
Left ventricular septal pacing versus left bundle branch pacing in the treatment of atrioventricular block.左心室间隔部起搏与左束支起搏治疗房室传导阻滞的比较。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2022 May;27(3):e12944. doi: 10.1111/anec.12944. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
9
Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features.左束支区域起搏:心电图特征。
J Arrhythm. 2021 Aug 7;37(5):1139-1147. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12610. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture.V6-V1 间期:诊断左束支阻滞夺获的新指标
Europace. 2022 Jan 4;24(1):40-47. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab164.