Suppr超能文献

双能 CT 检测头颈部骨髓水肿:是否准备好临床应用?

Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in the Head and Neck With Dual-Energy CT: Ready for Clinical Use?

机构信息

Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Apr;214(4):893-899. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21881. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of dual-energy CT (DECT) to identify bone marrow edema (BME) in the head and neck region in comparison with MRI as the standard of reference. A total of 33 patients who underwent imaging between February 2016 and February 2018 were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent both DECT and MRI for head and neck abnormalities. Two radiologists independently visually assessed virtual noncalcium (VNCa) reconstructions with color-coded maps for the presence of BME. STIR or T2-weighted MRI reconstructions with fat suppression were used as the standard of reference for BME. Subjective quality assessment and severity of metal artifacts were scored on both imaging modalities. BME was detected in 18 patients on DECT compared with 20 patients on MRI. Most BME seen on DECT was located in the mandible. VNCa DECT images had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for BME of 85%, 92%, 94%, and 80% respectively, using MRI as the reference. The quality of the images was rated as excellent to moderate in 94% of the patients for VNCa DECT compared with 82% of the patients for MRI, but this difference was not statistically significant. Significantly more metal artifacts were scored on the mixed DECT images than on the MR images, but these artifacts did not interfere with diagnosis. BME detection in the head and neck region seems possible with VNCa DECT images and has the potential to provide an alternative for MRI in clinical practice.

摘要

本研究旨在评估双能 CT(DECT)在识别头颈部骨髓水肿(BME)方面的能力,并将其与 MRI 作为参考标准进行比较。这项回顾性研究共纳入了 33 例 2016 年 2 月至 2018 年 2 月期间因头颈部异常接受影像学检查的患者。所有患者均同时接受 DECT 和 MRI 检查。两位放射科医生独立地通过彩色编码图对虚拟非钙(VNCa)重建进行视觉评估,以确定是否存在 BME。STIR 或 T2 加权 MRI 重建加脂肪抑制被用作 BME 的参考标准。对两种成像方式的主观质量评估和金属伪影的严重程度进行评分。与 MRI 相比,在 18 例患者的 DECT 上检测到 BME,在 20 例患者的 MRI 上检测到 BME。在 DECT 上看到的大多数 BME 位于下颌骨。使用 MRI 作为参考,VNCa DECT 图像对 BME 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 85%、92%、94%和 80%。与 MRI 相比,94%的患者对 VNCa DECT 图像的质量评为优秀到中等,而 82%的患者对 MRI 图像的质量评为优秀到中等,但差异无统计学意义。混合 DECT 图像上的金属伪影评分明显高于 MR 图像,但这些伪影不影响诊断。使用 VNCa DECT 图像似乎可以在头颈部区域检测到 BME,并且有可能在临床实践中替代 MRI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验