Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Division of Hematology, Oncology and Cellular Therapy, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 May;26(5):1013-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.01.028. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
Fluid overload (FO) grade ≥2 (more than 10% weight gain from baseline) has recently been recognized as an important toxicity associated with a high rate of nonrelapse mortality in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). The causes for FO remain unclear. We hypothesized that endothelial damage, possibly due to treatments received prior to AHCT, may be associated with this toxicity and sought to determine whether the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) (defined as lactate dehydrogenase [U/L] × creatinine [mg/dL]/platelets [10 cells/L]) correlates with grade ≥2 FO in 2 cohorts of recipients of AHCT at our institution. We tested our hypothesis in a cohort of 145 consecutive recipients (study cohort) of AHCT transplant from HLA-haploidentical donors and validated the findings in a cohort of 449 (validation cohort) recipients of AHCT from HLA-matched donors who underwent transplantation between 2010 and 2015. Predictors of grade ≥2 FO were evaluated using competing risks regression in univariate analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis in multivariate analysis. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 FO was estimated considering death as a competing risk. EASIX scores were evaluated based on log-transformed values. Optimal predictive EASIX cutoff values were determined based on receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Grade ≥2 FO occurred in 21% and 6% of the study and validation cohorts, respectively, with the majority of these cases being diagnosed before the day of AHCT. Median log EASIX score at admission was 2.4 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.3, 3.7) and 2.5 (IQR, 1.4, 3.9) in the 2 respective cohorts. In univariate analysis, high EASIX at admission was a significant predictor of grade ≥2 FO in the study (cutoff: 4.4, hazard ratio [HR] = 4.8, P < .001) and in the validation (cutoff: 4.3, HR = 4.8, P < .001) cohorts. The significant effect of EASIX persisted in multivariate CART analysis in the study (HR = 6.3, P < .001) and the validation (HR = 28, P = .002) cohorts. Additional predictors in multivariate analysis included body weight below 80 kg in recipients older than 55 years (HR = 4.5, P < .001) in the study cohort and diabetes (HR = 34, P = .001) and age >60 years (HR = 9.6, P = .04) in the validation cohort. At admission, the prevalence of EASIX score of >4.3 (18% versus 17%, P = .9) was not different between the diabetics and nondiabetics. EASIX score at admission is a significant predictor of grade ≥2 FO in recipients of AHCT from HLA-haploidentical or HLA-matched donors. Independently of EASIX, older patients with low weight were associated with increased risk of grade ≥2 FO for recipients of HLA-haploidentical transplants. For the HLA-matched cohort, diabetes and older age were associated with increased FO risk. These findings require validation in external cohorts.
液体超负荷(FO)等级≥2(体重比基线增加超过 10%)最近被认为是异基因造血细胞移植(AHCT)受者中与非复发死亡率高相关的重要毒性。FO 的原因仍不清楚。我们假设内皮损伤,可能是由于 AHCT 前接受的治疗,可能与这种毒性有关,并试图确定内皮激活和应激指数(EASIX)(定义为乳酸脱氢酶[U/L]×肌酐[mg/dL]/血小板[10 细胞/L])是否与我们机构接受 AHCT 的 2 组受者的 FO 等级≥2 相关。我们在接受 HLA 单倍体相合供体 AHCT 的 145 例连续受者(研究队列)中检验了我们的假设,并在接受 HLA 匹配供体 AHCT 的 449 例(验证队列)受者中验证了这一发现,这些受者在 2010 年至 2015 年间接受了移植。使用竞争风险回归进行单变量分析和分类回归树(CART)分析进行多变量分析来评估 FO 等级≥2 的预测因素。考虑死亡为竞争风险,估计 FO 等级≥2 的累积发生率。EASIX 评分基于对数转换值进行评估。基于受试者工作特征曲线分析确定最佳预测 EASIX 截断值。研究和验证队列的 FO 等级≥2 发生率分别为 21%和 6%,其中大多数病例在 AHCT 前确诊。2 个队列各自的中位数入院时 log EASIX 评分分别为 2.4(四分位距[IQR],1.3,3.7)和 2.5(IQR,1.4,3.9)。单变量分析显示,入院时 EASIX 较高是研究队列(截断值:4.4,危险比[HR]为 4.8,P<0.001)和验证队列(截断值:4.3,HR 为 4.8,P<0.001)FO 等级≥2 的显著预测因素。EASIX 的显著影响在研究队列(HR 为 6.3,P<0.001)和验证队列(HR 为 28,P=0.002)的多变量 CART 分析中仍然存在。多变量分析中的其他预测因素包括 55 岁以上受者体重低于 80kg(HR 为 4.5,P<0.001)和研究队列中的糖尿病(HR 为 34,P=0.001)和年龄>60 岁(HR 为 9.6,P=0.04)在验证队列中。入院时,EASIX 评分>4.3(18%比 17%,P=0.9)的比例在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者之间没有差异。入院时的 EASIX 评分是接受 HLA 单倍体相合或 HLA 匹配供体 AHCT 受者 FO 等级≥2 的显著预测因素。独立于 EASIX,体重较低的老年患者与 HLA 单倍体移植受者 FO 等级≥2 的风险增加相关。对于 HLA 匹配队列,糖尿病和年龄较大与 FO 风险增加相关。这些发现需要在外部队列中验证。